• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Transoral Robotic Surgery Newest Treatment Option for Oropharyngeal Cancers

by Jill U. Adams • April 1, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Transoral Robotic Surgery, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Offer Comparable Survival Estimates for Early T-Stage Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • SM13: Transoral Surgery Valuable Tool in Treatment of Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • Rates of Post-Transoral Robotic Surgery Hemorrhage Are Low
  • What is the Role of Trans-Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) in HPV Negative Oropharyngeal Cancer?
Explore This Issue
April 2014


Treatment of oropharyngeal cancers, which has seen major changes over the years, may be on the brink of yet another development. The newest treatment option on the block is tumor removal using state-of-the-art robotic technology. Several factors have played into the trend, one of which is the availability of the daVinci robotic surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, Calif.) at hospitals, because the technology has become useful to other departments, such as urology and thoracic surgery. Equally important, though, is the changing nature of oropharyngeal cancers.

The Rise of HPV

Oropharyngeal cancers caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are on the rise. A 2011 study analyzed tumors collected by three cancer registry sites for traces of HPV infection and then projected those findings onto the U.S. population. Their results found an incidence rate of 0.8 HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers per 100,000 in 1984. By 2004, that rate had more than tripled to 2.6 per 100,000 (J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4294-4301).

If this trend continues, the number of new HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers will surpass the numbers for cervical cancer by the year 2020. Yet, public awareness of tonsil and tongue cancers has not kept pace. News stories about vaccination against HPV still focus heavily on the prevention of cervical cancers in women. If and when vaccination is widely adopted in boys and girls in the U.S, we might expect to blunt the rise in cases—at least a couple of decades from now.

Why HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers are on the rise is not entirely clear, though increased exposure undoubtedly plays a part. The virus is transmitted via physical contact, and sexual transmission is thought to be the primary mode of exposure. The viral strain in tonsil and tongue cancers is the same as in cervical cancer, HPV-16. And, as is the case with cervical disease, a vast majority of people exposed to HPV manage to clear the virus from their bodies. For a small minority, the virus is incorporated into DNA, which leads to squamous carcinoma.

Meanwhile, HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancers have declined by 50% (from two per 100,000 to one per 100,000) over the same time period. Head and neck surgeons have noticed the rise in HPV-associated cancers, and many say that these cases dominate their practices.

While HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal tumors are both squamous carcinomas, there are important differences that can influence choice of treatment. “HPV-related cancers are characteristically smaller primary tumors,” said Robert Ferris, MD, PhD, chief of head and neck surgery at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. “They’re easier to get at and are more resectable, and they also have a dramatically better prognosis, so the morbidity of therapy is much more important to consider.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Practice Focus, Special Reports Tagged With: cancer, head and neck, TORS, transoral robotic surgeryIssue: April 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • Transoral Robotic Surgery, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Offer Comparable Survival Estimates for Early T-Stage Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • SM13: Transoral Surgery Valuable Tool in Treatment of Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • Rates of Post-Transoral Robotic Surgery Hemorrhage Are Low
  • What is the Role of Trans-Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) in HPV Negative Oropharyngeal Cancer?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939