• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Pay4Call: Economic, Ethical, and Quality Issues of Payment for Taking Call: Physicians Angry at Lack of Payment

by Margot Fromer • December 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

WASHINGTON, DC—In one of the first sessions at the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery annual meeting, otolaryngologists made it overwhelmingly clear that they believe they should be paid for being on call for emergencies and consultations.

You Might Also Like

  • Situation Critical: Otolaryngologists See Diminishing Returns for Taking Emergency Call
  • Hybrid Physician Payment System Can Ensure Quality, Customer Service
  • Gifting Season Can Present Ethical Dilemma for Physicians
  • Otolaryngologists Discuss Difficult Ethical Issues
Explore This Issue
December 2007

Steven F. Isenberg, MD, a physician in private practice in Indianapolis, was one of the two moderators. He summarized the critical points by saying that payment would improve the quality of health care, ensure fairness for physicians, and increase access to care. Some specialties—for instance, the American Academy of Neurology—have policies that link call reimbursement with high-quality health care. The AAO–HNS has determined that call compensation is “ethical.”

Health Care Quality

“Caring for patients around the clock without regard to adequate time off creates risks for patients and health care concerns for physicians,” said Dr. Isenberg, referring specifically to the mental and motor incapacity that arises from sleepiness and fatigue, which is physiologically the same as alcohol intoxication, and which can result in impaired performance, an increased chance of medical errors, and a generally negative effect on medical practice. He noted that airlines do not hesitate to cancel flights, regardless of how annoying and inconvenient for passengers, if crews would have to work into their mandated rest time. Sufficient rest is equally important for physicians, he said.

He described the New Jersey law that allows the state to bring vehicular homicide charges against a driver who is fatigued and causes an accident as a result. Yet physicians are expected to work 24 hours or more at maximum capacity without worrying about liability issues—a true catch-22.

Fairness

Across the country, otolaryngologists are rarely paid for taking call, whereas other medical specialties (general surgery, neurology, and orthopedics, for example) routinely receive such compensation. What’s more, when otolaryngologists do take call, general specialists cover it, and subspecialists are excused, thus leaving them out in the fiscal cold.

Dr. Isenberg“Hospitals routinely increase call requirements without the permission of otolaryngologists—and without even consulting them,” noted Dr. Isenberg.

Leonard Brown, MD, a private practitioner in Knoxville, TN, the other panelist, said that physicians have less and less input into the health care system in general and little, if any, voice in the way hospitals are administered. For example, physicians who are employed by a hospital get paid for call, and those in private practice do not. Many otolaryngologists complain that ER physicians “dump” patients, particularly those with facial trauma—that is, they set these patients aside until the specialist on call arrives—without even attempting treatment. Moreover, when an otolaryngologist is called to the ER, his or her own patients either have to be rescheduled or are kept waiting far longer than usual.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Practice Management Issue: December 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Situation Critical: Otolaryngologists See Diminishing Returns for Taking Emergency Call
  • Hybrid Physician Payment System Can Ensure Quality, Customer Service
  • Gifting Season Can Present Ethical Dilemma for Physicians
  • Otolaryngologists Discuss Difficult Ethical Issues

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939