• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New Staging System Proposed for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer

August 18, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The New Staging
In the new system, the 7th edition N categories were reclassified as follows:
• ICON-S N0 = no lymph nodes involved;
• ICON-S N1 = ipsilateral lymph nodes;
• ICON-S N2 = bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes; and
• ICON-S N3 = lymph nodes > 6 cm (with no subdivision of T4 disease).
The new proposed ICON-S classification consists of the following stages:
• stage I (T1–T2N0–N1);
• stage II (T1–T2N2 or T3N0–N2); and
• stage III (T4 or N3) (with metastatic disease classified as stage IV).

You Might Also Like

  • Tests Emerging as Standards for Diagnosing HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • HPV Status an Independent Prognostic Factor for Oropharyngeal Cancer Survival
  • HPV Related to Rise in Head and Neck Cancers
  • Further Research Needed for HPV-Related Cancer Surveillance
Explore This Issue
August 2016

In an exploratory training cohort (n = 702), lymph node involvement in the lower neck was significantly associated with survival in ICON-S stage III disease but not in stage I or II disease and was not a significant independent predictor. There was no significant difference in survival for less than five versus five or more involved nodes across ICON-S stages.
The authors of the study say that ICON-S stage classification predicts prognosis in different jurisdictions. Historical data can be converted readily into the ICON-S classification. They also anticipate that the ICON-S TNM will address the other aims of staging beyond prognostication, including determining clinical trials eligibility and stratification, monitoring adherence to clinical guidelines, assessing treatment outcome, facilitating translational research, and supporting cancer control activities.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Head and Neck, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, HPV, oropharyngeal cancer, stagingIssue: August 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Tests Emerging as Standards for Diagnosing HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • HPV Status an Independent Prognostic Factor for Oropharyngeal Cancer Survival
  • HPV Related to Rise in Head and Neck Cancers
  • Further Research Needed for HPV-Related Cancer Surveillance

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you served as an expert witness in a case that’s gone to trial?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
    • Composition and Priorities of Multidisciplinary Pediatric Thyroid Programs: A Consensus Statement
    • Artificial Intelligence as Author: Can Scientific Reviewers Recognize GPT- 4o–Generated Manuscripts?
    • Self-Administered Taste Testing Without Water: Normative Data for the 53-Item WETT
    • Long-Term Particulate Matter Exposure May Increase Risk of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis: Results from an Exposure-Matched Study

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939