• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Best Timing for Second Implant in Pediatric Bilateral Cochlear Implantation

by Peter L. Santa Maria MBBS, PhD, and John S. Oghalai, MD • September 8, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Trio Best Practice

You Might Also Like

  • Is Bilateral Cochlear Implantation Cost-Effective Compared to Unilateral Cochlear Implantation?
  • Bilateral CI in Children Shows Few Benefits Over Unilateral Implantation
  • How Old Is Too Old for Cochlear Implantation for Congenital Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss?
  • When Should Adults with Bilateral Hearing Loss Be Referred for Cochlear Implant Evaluation?
Explore This Issue
September 2015

Background

The benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation in the pediatric population include better sound localization, benefits with speech in noise, and improved language development. In the pediatric patient who meets the criteria for bilateral cochlear implantation, should the surgeries be performed simultaneously or sequentially? If sequentially, what is the best timing?

The importance of early implantation in this group has been recognized; however, some concerns have affected the timing of the second implant. Concerns that bilateral implantation may risk bilateral vestibular hypofunction, the loss of an intact cochlear for future therapies, or financial and reimbursement issues have lead some clinics to wait for the second side. Families may choose to wait for a variety of nonmedical reasons. This article aims to address these issues, as well as to review the benefits of early implantation in the second side.

Best Practice

Using the best available evidence, bilateral pediatric implant candidates should receive bilateral simultaneous implants when feasible; this leads to better outcomes and symmetry in central auditory development without increasing complications. However, this recommendation should be balanced by the child’s social and family situation, as well as the experience of the surgeon. If sequential implantation is undertaken, it is recommended at the earliest opportunity, preferably within 12 months following the first implant (Laryngoscope. 2014;124:1511-1512).

Filed Under: Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Pediatric, Pediatric, Practice Focus, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: bilateral, cochlear implant, pediatricIssue: September 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • Is Bilateral Cochlear Implantation Cost-Effective Compared to Unilateral Cochlear Implantation?
  • Bilateral CI in Children Shows Few Benefits Over Unilateral Implantation
  • How Old Is Too Old for Cochlear Implantation for Congenital Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss?
  • When Should Adults with Bilateral Hearing Loss Be Referred for Cochlear Implant Evaluation?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Has your practice or department been affected by the lack of anesthesiologists?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Rewriting the Rules of Rhinosinusitis

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment

    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024

    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
    • Bottleneck In the OR: How Anesthesiologist Shortages Threaten Surgical Care
    • Onboarding and Working with APPs
    • Evaluating Treatment Patterns in Bell’s Palsy Using Nationwide Employer- Sponsored Healthcare Claims
    • Randomized Trials Comparing Inferior Turbinoplasty Techniques for Nasal Obstruction

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939