• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Courting Justice: ENT Surgeons in the Witness Box

by Linda Kossoff • November 4, 2025

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

For medical professionals, operating within the legal sphere involves a learning curve and a period of adjustment. Legal terminology is a good example. “I’ve seen so many cases where people are asked, ‘What is the definition of “standard of care”?’ and they struggle,” Dr. Terris said. “Even though we as physicians don’t think about the legal definition of the term, you need to understand it if you’re going to do this kind of work.”

You Might Also Like

  • Cosmetic Techniques and Reconstruction Becoming Integral to Head and Neck Surgery
  • Distinguished Panel Deliberates Expert Witness Testimony
  • What Is the Value of Second Opinion Services to Otolaryngologists and Their Patients?
  • Endoscopic Technology Brings Major Changes to Head and Neck Surgery
Explore This Issue
November 2025

The pace of legal proceedings is infamously slow, a fact that has astonished physicians who work on medical cases. “I think if you asked in a questionnaire to physicians what surprised them most about being expert witnesses, the absolute number one answer would be the length of time the process takes,” Dr. Postma said. “It can be so unbearably drawn out, it’s downright funny. Like, one weekend I’ll be looking at a box of legal material in my study, and there’s dust on it because it has been two years. So, I call the attorney on the case, and she says, ‘Oh, it’s still moving.’”

Dr. Gillespie recalls a case he worked on for which a trial date had been set, but which was ultimately dropped by the plaintiffs. “They realized they were going to lose,” he recalled. “But it had gone on for six years! I told one of the attorneys, ‘You know, they built Hoover Dam in four years.’ It can be excruciating for the defendant physician, who may feel scrutinized and impugned as this process plays out.” Indeed, lawsuits can take a high emotional toll on the medical professional defendant. “It can be lonely for them, so serving as an expert on the defense side, you feel like kind of a friend to that practitioner,” Dr. Gillespie said.

One of the steeper areas of the learning curve concerns the ability to answer attorneys’ questions accurately and concisely. “If you’re going to do this kind of work, it’s your obligation to anticipate what questions you’re going to be asked and make sure you’re ready to answer them,” Dr. Terris said. “I feel a certain amount of pressure to perform well. Good attorneys can help with that process, especially in preparing a less experienced witness.”

Listening skills become especially important. “You can’t be thinking of your answer before the question is asked,” Dr. Gillespie said. “You have to listen to the wording of the question. My most acute listening skills are probably applied during depositions and testimonies.” A common mistake witnesses make is talking too much during the deposition. “Just listen to the question and then answer it. If it’s a yes/no question, your answer should be either yes or no,” Dr. Terris cautioned. “It shouldn’t expound beyond that, except in rare circumstances.” Expounding becomes necessary, says Dr. Gillespie, “when the question is asked in a way that will make a yes or no answer sound like you’re saying something against the side you’re representing. You have a right to expound upon your reasons for answering a certain way, as in ‘Yes, but in this circumstance’… etc. Take the time to make these points during the deposition because it is meant to get your opinions on the record.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Business of Medicine, Career, Home Slider, Legal Matters, Professional Development Tagged With: Serving as expert witnessIssue: November 2025

You Might Also Like:

  • Cosmetic Techniques and Reconstruction Becoming Integral to Head and Neck Surgery
  • Distinguished Panel Deliberates Expert Witness Testimony
  • What Is the Value of Second Opinion Services to Otolaryngologists and Their Patients?
  • Endoscopic Technology Brings Major Changes to Head and Neck Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use TXA to reduce intraoperative and post-op bleeding?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Call for Resident Bowl Questions

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • Ethical Obligations and Duty to Advocate for Patients in Prior Authorization for Surgery

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Growing Use of Tranexamic Acid in Otolaryngology
    • Reconnect, Recharge, Relax, and Choose Joy This Season
    • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
    • Faculty Mentorship of Academic Surgeons
    • CMS’ New Rule Aims to Streamline the Prior Authorization Process

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939