ENTtoday
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Do Electronic Health Records Deserve to Get a Bad Rap?

by Richard Quinn • December 11, 2018

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Put a few otolaryngologists in a room together and each will likely have a story about how electronic medical record (EMR) systems have made life more difficult. Time away from the patient, they’ll say. Or hours spent on paperwork that could be used to build a practice, they’ll note. Money lost, they’ll grouse.

You Might Also Like

  • Can Electronic Health Records Impact Malpractice Liability?
  • How Electronic Health Records Impact Physician–Patient Relationship
  • Deadline Looms for ENTs to Put Electronic Health Records to Meaningful Use
  • Electronic Health Records: The National Perspective
Explore This Issue
December 2018

Everyone hates EMRs, right?

Well, not really, said Gregory Ator, MD, associate professor and director of the Division of Otology/Neurotology at University at Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City. Dr. Ator and colleagues recently surveyed approximately 500 providers in their medical system and, surprisingly, found that two-thirds have a positive view of EMR.

“One of the things I want to talk more about is, ‘What can a well-designed, well-implemented EMR do for the doctor?’” said Dr. Ator, who is also the chief medical informatics officer (CMIO) for the University of Kansas Health System. “I think that’s one of the things that we in this business have not thought about,” he added.

In fact, Dr. Ator thinks EMR has gotten a bad rap. To be sure, the fits and starts of nascent systems have caused myriad issues for otolaryngologists and other specialists. But as vendors have improved, systems have been upgraded. The promise of EMRs—more efficient workflow, improved patient care, even increased patient safety—is still worthwhile, Dr. Ator said.

“The core concept in informatics is that a computer plus a person is better than the person alone,” Dr. Ator said. “That’s really a fairly complex topic, because that includes concepts such as human-machine interface …[but] assuming that’s all done right, the computer can be, not an intrusive thing, but something that helps the doctor be better.”

Understanding the Past

Luis Saldaña, MD, chief medical information officer at Texas Health Resources of Arlington, Texas, acknowledged that the initial introduction of EMRs over the past decade has had issues.

Physicians wanted “this tool to help them be more compliant, but then it can easily become your master,” Dr. Saldaña said. “You go from it serving you to [you] serving it because, all of a sudden, the requirements and expectations just grow and grow.”

Those reporting requirements, especially to older physicians who spent decades writing “succinct, hand-written notes that effectively communicated what happened,” turned off many users, Dr. Saldaña added. “Now, even just the daily progress note, to fulfill the least-perceived regulatory requirements for being reimbursed … you have to create notes that are two full pages long,” he said. “We’ve created this kind of monster, and that whole journey kind of then led to this split.”

The split, as described by Drs. Saldaña and Ator, is that EMR users have lined up in proverbial camps. “For some people, they don’t see any way out,” Dr. Saldaña said. “And other people have a lot of hope; they’ve learned to master the tool to [fit into] their work flows, and they thrive. Then, there are a lot who struggle. It’s probably a bell curve of physicians. The great majority fall in the middle.”

Gregory Ator, MDThe core concept in informatics is that a computer plus a person is better than the person alone … assuming that’s all done right, the computer can be, not an intrusive thing, but something that helps the doctor be better. —Gregory Ator, MD

Teaching the Future

Laura Fitzmaurice, MD, a pediatrician and CMIO at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, said that things are better now than when EMRs first appeared on the scene. Part of the reason they have a bad reputation is that studies and anecdotal evidence on their efficacy lag the technology, she said. “There have been a lot of advances, but I feel like sometimes in the literature, we’re behind,” added Dr. Fitzmaurice. “Stuff out there is from maybe a few years ago, [and] advances are happening so quickly.”

In large part, those advances arise from the fact that CMIOs across the country are working to ensure that rank-and-file physicians don’t give up on technology. “In the beginning, it was trying to get people up on EMR,” Dr. Fitzmaurice said. “Now, it’s about, ‘What do we need to improve your experience? How can we do more for your workflow?’ We’re using science from human factors, interactions. We’re using LEAN process improvement. Technology project management that’s with LEAN. Trying to just keep working through.”

© ChooChin / shutterstock.com

© ChooChin / shutterstock.com

Dr. Saldaña agreed that working with all stakeholders is important all the time, not just when choosing a vendor up front. “When we implemented the electronic health record, we didn’t just say we’re turning it on, and that’s it,” he said. “It was, we’re going to partner with you to try to continue to make it better. And that’s a commitment.”

Dr. Ator said he is working on future research to help better identify different types of EMR users. By being able to understand the types of users, EMRs can take the next step in being more useful to them, he added.

Take “digital natives,” for example. Those are people who have grown up on technology that older physicians came to later in life. Or, “low-touch users” and “super-users,” physicians who are on either end of the spectrum depending on often they integrate technology into their daily flow.

“If you have a low-touch doctor, you can imagine that they aren’t going to be so inclined to interact with a computer on a decision if they’re just kind of sour on the whole concept,” Dr. Ator said. “That’s why it’s very complex. Human factors, machine interactions. You have to deal with people differently …. We must deal with the adoption of technology differently, depending on where people come from.”


Richard Quinn is a freelance writer in New Jersey.

Not Enough Chief Medical Informatics Officers

Otolaryngologist Gregory Ator, MD, chief medical informatics officer (CMIO) for the University of Kansas Health System, believes more institutions would be helped by having CMIOs help lead the way through the next generation of systems improvement.

“People like me are fairly hard to find,” he said. “Nationwide, we tend to be involved with big institutions. And who can afford us? We have 1,900 providers at our place, so 300-plus people in the (information technology group); that’s a lot different than the one- or two-person group that’s trying to do EMR.”

Some statistics on the prevalence of CMIOs:

  • 73% are in their first CMIO position, a nod to the newness of the designation;
  • 75% still practice medicine as the demands on their time remain split;
  • 38% report to chief medical officers, with just 4% reporting straight to a CEO; and
  • The report listed as a top priority “EMR: new installs/reinstalls, usability, optimization, standardization, personalization.”

Source: 2018 AMDIS-Gartner 14th Annual CMIO Survey

Pages: 1 2 3 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Departments, Tech Talk Tagged With: EHR, electronic health records, patient careIssue: December 2018

You Might Also Like:

  • Can Electronic Health Records Impact Malpractice Liability?
  • How Electronic Health Records Impact Physician–Patient Relationship
  • Deadline Looms for ENTs to Put Electronic Health Records to Meaningful Use
  • Electronic Health Records: The National Perspective

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Is There a Crisis in the Otolaryngology Match?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Experts Delve into Treatment Options for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Post-Tonsillectomy Taste Disorders Rare but Present
    • 10 Novel Ways to Disseminate Scientific Information
    • How to Work with Sales and Marketing Representatives in Your Medical Practice
    • How Medicine Helped Surgeon Prepare for Career as Writer
    • Best Practices for Emergency Surgical Airway
    • Spare Roof Technique Can Improve Patient Quality of Life after Rhinoplasty

Polls

Will registry information and data science improve patient care?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2019 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.