• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

EMR and Advertising: Strange Bedfellows?

by Angela Munasque • July 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Electronic medical records (EMR) are to health care professionals what world peace is to humanity-everyone wants it, but not everyone agrees how to go about it.

You Might Also Like

  • Update Your Practice: Follow these tips to select the right EMR for your group
  • COSM 2012: TRIO Guest of Honor Cautions against Physician Advertising
  • Face Time: Ask the right questions when meeting with EMR vendors
  • Lessons Learned: How to overcome the cultural barriers to EMR implementation
Explore This Issue
July 2008

One EMR company, however, San Francisco-based Practice Fusion, is quickly finding success with physicians of all types. Undoubtedly, one of Practice Fusion’s draws is that it’s free to use. The catch-and the factor that agitates naysayers-is that the product is sprinkled with advertisements that are based on the content of the medical records. Practice Fusion launched its revamped EMR and Practice Management suite in October 2007 and, by the beginning of April 2008, had at least 500 users. Adoption has been phenomenal, said Ryan Howard, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Practice Fusion. The growth is unprecedented right now.

Free, and Then Some

The cost-or rather, the lack thereof-of Practice Fusion is a selling point that sets it apart from other health information technology products. There’s obviously a federal mandate, said Mr. Howard, referring to the nationwide goal of implementing EMR by 2015, as presented by President Bush in April 2004. But the low adoption is directly attributed to the very inflated costs of solutions today, the intrusiveness of implementing a solution, as well as the time needed to get the system implemented and users trained on the system.

With these challenges in mind, Mr. Howard and his colleagues developed the free, browser-based EMR product that can be implemented in five minutes and for which training takes one hour. Within 24 hours, patient data will have been extracted from a practice’s billing system and imported into the EMR and practice management system.

From there, physicians can create chart notes of visits and calls, manage medication allergies and immunizations, track appointments and patients, send nursing orders and billing messages, among other features.

With a Catch

Michael S. Benninger, MD

Michael S. Benninger, MD

As proud as he is of Practice Fusion, Mr. Howard is forthright about the catch: The product is direct-to-physician message-supported-there’s advertising in the product, to cut to the chase. He added, But the advertising is not intrusive. It’s completely private. There are no pop-ups. There’s no obligation to click on the advertising.

These aren’t ordinary, random ads. Ads, powered by Google’s AdSense and similar programs, are generated by keywords found in patients’ information. Anyone familiar with Google’s Gmail has already experienced how these programs work.

Previously, Practice Fusion, too, carried a fee, but its executives discovered that any price was too high for these doctors, said Mr. Howard. So we decided to come up with a novel way to subsidize the cost of the solution.

Commercialism and Bias

As one might expect, there has been some alarm among both physicians and the public about the interplay of commercialism and medicine with Practice Fusion and similar products. For example, a recent article in the New York Times (http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/03/this-blood-test-is-brought-to-you-by/ ) and readers’ comments following it expressed concern about the possibility that these ads could influence a physician’s decisions in treating patients.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Everyday Ethics, Health Policy, Practice Management, Tech Talk Tagged With: advertising, EHR, electronic health records, Ethics, healthcare reform, marketing, patient safety, pharmaceuticals, policy, practice management, technologyIssue: July 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Update Your Practice: Follow these tips to select the right EMR for your group
  • COSM 2012: TRIO Guest of Honor Cautions against Physician Advertising
  • Face Time: Ask the right questions when meeting with EMR vendors
  • Lessons Learned: How to overcome the cultural barriers to EMR implementation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939