• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

For Laryngomalacia, Microdebrider-Assisted Supraglottoplasty Preferred

by Alice Goodman • May 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The microdebrider is a safe instrument in trained hands; there is no risk of airway fire, thermal damage, or associated burn to the tissues. Dr. Zalzal said that the biggest advantage of microdebrider-assisted supraglottoplasty is shortened surgical time-about 15 minutes shorter than with the CO2 laser. The microdebrider is practically painless, and it glides over any cartilage that is present-it does not cut the cartilage or burn it, like the laser, he said.

You Might Also Like

  • Does Supraglottoplasty Improve Outcomes in Children with Laryngomalacia?
  • Supraglottoplasty Can Improve AHI, LSAT in Pediatric OSA Patients
  • State of the Art in Tonsillectomy
  • Pulsed-Dye Laser May Be Useful for Vocal Fold Scarring
Explore This Issue
May 2008

The main downside of the microdebrider is that its aggressive use can result in the removal of too much tissue; but in trained hands, this rarely, if ever, happens, Dr. Zalzal said. The microdebrider is well tolerated and is used in other types of laryngeal diseases, such as laryngeal papillomas, Dr. Collins added.

Training

Typically, a surgeon would be trained to use the microdebrider during his or her residency. At Dr. Zalzal’s institution, residents come from three medical schools; the division also has a fellowship training program. Once a resident becomes adept at suspension microlaryngoscopy and microlaryngeal instruments, he or she would then observe several cases done with a microdebrider. Then we would teach them where to cut, avoiding the interarytenoid area. Then they would perform their own cases, Dr. Zalzal explained.

Two types of microdebriders are currently on the market-one made by Medtronic and one by Gyrus. Neither Dr. Zalzal nor Dr. Collins has a commercial interest in these products.

More about Microdebriders

A microdebrider consists of three key components:

  • Console;
  • Handpiece;
  • Blade.

The console is controlled by a foot pedal that determines the speed and direction of the rotating blade. The handpiece controls the blade and integrates suction to rapidly remove the debris. Suctioning tubes connect to the handpiece. The blade (or bit) can be smooth or serrated and comes in a variety of sizes; blades can be rotated in forward, reverse, or oscillating modes at various speeds.

The main risk of microdebriders is the possibility of removal of normal tissue, which can happen if overzealous suction pressure is used. The operator should always maintain adequate visualization of the blade or bur and be aware of using the instrument too aggressively.

Microbrider Applications

Studies have shown that the microdebrider can be an effective tool for diverse types of procedures. Researchers state that it is a convenient and efficient tool, with several advantages and only one identified risk-that is, inadvertent removal of normal tissue.

Obstructing airway lesions can be removed by the microdebrider, with the obvious goal of restoring oxygenation to the patient. These lesions may be seen in patients with lung cancer or in patients with certain benign conditions, such as postintubation tracheal stenosis, relapsing polychondritis, and Wegener’s granulomatosis.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Laryngology, Medical Education, Pediatric, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Tech Talk Tagged With: airway, Dysphagia, Dysphonia, outcomes, pediatrics, research, surgery, techniques, technology, training, treatmentIssue: May 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Does Supraglottoplasty Improve Outcomes in Children with Laryngomalacia?
  • Supraglottoplasty Can Improve AHI, LSAT in Pediatric OSA Patients
  • State of the Art in Tonsillectomy
  • Pulsed-Dye Laser May Be Useful for Vocal Fold Scarring

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939