• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

In-Office Conscious Sedation Is Safe When Used Properly

by Paula Moyer • December 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

As otolaryngologists are performing more procedures on an in-office basis, more are also using conscious sedation in the clinic setting. They are not alone: nearly 70% of all surgical procedures are performed on an outpatient basis with conscious sedation, which avoids the costs of inpatient care. The demand for conscious sedation currently exceeds the availability of anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists to administer the sedation, and therefore more physicians and nurses are being trained in the administration and monitoring of conscious sedation, at both moderate and deep levels.

You Might Also Like

  • Office-Based FNA Thyroid Nodule Biopsies a Viable Option
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Percutaneous Dilation Tracheotomy Can Be a Safe, Effective Nonsurgical Option
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology
Explore This Issue
December 2006

Not surprisingly, the trend toward surgeons administering in-office conscious sedation themselves is occurring alongside concerns about safety. An article in the Wall Street Journal (August 9, 2006) pointed to the risks associated with conscious sedation, and particularly with nonanesthesiologist practitioners administering it. New guidelines have been developed by both the University HealthSystems Consortium (UHC) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) to address these concerns and ensure the safe use of conscious sedation when the state of moderate sedation is induced. The ASA guidelines (www.asahq.org/publicationsAndServices/credentialing.pdf ) define levels of sedation and monitoring equipment, as well as the formal training, that a practitioner should have in order to safely administer moderate sedation. Both organizations are also developing guidelines for non-anesthesia professionals to administer deep sedation.

The guidelines define moderate sedation as a drug-induced depression of consciousness during which patients respond purposefully to verbal commands, either alone or accompanied by light tactile stimulation, and specify that intubation is not required and that spontaneous ventilation is adequate. Deep sedation is defined as a state in which patients cannot be easily aroused but respond purposefully following repeated or painful stimulation. Patients in deep sedation may also need intubation because spontaneous ventilation may be inadequate.

Proper Training Required

The key message is safety first, said Ira D. Papel, MD, in a phone interview. Physicians who use it need to be trained in appropriate dosing and have appropriate monitoring equipment, and they also need to know the signs that the patient may have an inappropriate dose, either too high or too low. Dr. Papel is a facial plastic and reconstructive surgeon in private practice in Baltimore, where he is an associate professor of otolaryngology/head and neck surgery at Johns Hopkins Medical Center. He is also an immediate past president of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Physicians are using it more often for minor surgical procedures, and they can use it in-office for many procedures that don’t need to be performed in the hospital or surgery center, he said. There are many settings that offer courses in conscious sedation. Most hospitals offer one-day courses, as do many associations’ conferences and meetings. Most hospitals are willing to give physicians the privilege to do conscious sedation if they’ve undergone such training.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Medical Education, Practice Management Tagged With: guidelines, in-office, outcomes, patient safety, practice management, research, sedation, surgery, trainingIssue: December 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Office-Based FNA Thyroid Nodule Biopsies a Viable Option
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Percutaneous Dilation Tracheotomy Can Be a Safe, Effective Nonsurgical Option
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939