• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

In-Office Conscious Sedation Is Safe When Used Properly

by Paula Moyer • December 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Although there are no special considerations for otolaryngologists to bear in mind for using conscious sedation, those who want to use it in their offices generally need more training, because it is not emphasized in residency, Dr. Papel said. He stressed that using it effectively requires different skills from those used to administer general anesthesia, which may be the frame of reference for most otolaryngologists.

You Might Also Like

  • Office-Based FNA Thyroid Nodule Biopsies a Viable Option
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Percutaneous Dilation Tracheotomy Can Be a Safe, Effective Nonsurgical Option
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology
Explore This Issue
December 2006

When a patient is under conscious sedation, the physician should monitor blood pressure, pulse, and blood oxygen saturation. Therefore, they should use the following monitoring equipment: a continuous blood pressure cuff, an electrocardiograph machine, and a pulse oximeter.

Responsive but not Reactive

The patient should be responsive to questions and directions, but should not be reacting to the procedure. You don’t want them to be too depressed, but the patient should not be feeling the procedure and having a bad experience, Dr. Papel said. Although the patient is awake and can respond to questions, he or she may not remember the procedure.

When offering conscious sedation to patients, physicians need to tell them that they cannot drive home and also should not rely on a taxi, because they may not be able to communicate directions effectively. Therefore, they should have a responsible family member or friend drive them instead. They should also not make any important decisions for 48 hours after receiving sedation, and they may feel the after- effects of sedation for several hours. Physicians should watch patients for approximately one-half hour after the procedure to make sure it is safe for them to leave. They should be breathing well, alert, and mobile.

Using conscious sedation should be feasible for most otolaryngologists, said Dr. Papel. Thousands of physicians are using it all over the country. If you have the proper monitoring equipment and remember that safety comes first, it should go well.

Caution Is in Order

Like Dr. Papel, Alastair Carruthers, MD, stressed in a phone interview that caution should be the guidepost for conscious sedation for any procedure. He is a clinical professor of dermatology at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and he is the president-elect of the American Society for Dermatologic Surgeons.

I think conscious sedation is extremely valuable in the right set of circumstances, he said. You want to have a patient with a good anesthetic risk, and you want a facility that is properly equipped, with proper monitoring and drugs to induce sedation and correct sedation if any problems occur.

He added that some procedures may not be appropriate for conscious sedation, or that the typical approach needs to be modified for a sedated patient. I don’t think it’s appropriate for liposuction unless you use a lower safe level of lidocaine, he said, noting that lidocaine and sedating agents are metabolized by the same liver enzymes, and therefore, the risk of drug-drug interaction is increased.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Medical Education, Practice Management Tagged With: guidelines, in-office, outcomes, patient safety, practice management, research, sedation, surgery, trainingIssue: December 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Office-Based FNA Thyroid Nodule Biopsies a Viable Option
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Percutaneous Dilation Tracheotomy Can Be a Safe, Effective Nonsurgical Option
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Physician Handwriting: A Potentially Powerful Healing Tool

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Physician Handwriting: A Potentially Powerful Healing Tool
    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939