• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

In-Office Ultrasound Provides Benefits to Both Patients and Physicians

by Sheri J. Polley • April 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Other options for obtaining the necessary equipment can include sharing equipment between specialty groups. If the geographic and scheduling logistics can be coordinated between offices, the sharing of equipment can significantly reduce the startup cost of initiating in-office ultrasound.

You Might Also Like

  • Sialendoscopy More Cost-Effective than Medical Management with Diagnostic Ultrasound for RAIS
  • Communicating with Patients and Staff via Electronic Office Communication Systems
  • Lean Neck Mass Clinic Model Reduces Time to Diagnosis
  • Ultrasound-Guided Needle Dye Injection by Surgeon Localizes Tumor
Explore This Issue
April 2007

Leasing of ultrasound equipment can also be considered as an alternative to purchasing the equipment outright.

Training

Although there are currently no certification requirements for the use of in-office ultrasound, several organizations are in the process of developing guidelines. Organizations including the American College of Emergency Physicians and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine have recommendations in place for education, training, and supervised performance before a physician uses ultrasound independently.

The Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery study identifies organizations which currently offer certification courses for head and neck ultrasound. These include:

  • American College of Surgeons (ACS)
  • American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACEO)
  • Radiological Society of North America
  • American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS)

The ACS certification program is modular in concept. Participants are required to first complete the basic core module, which is available on CD-ROM. This module covers introduction to the program, ultrasound physics, instrumentation and scanning technique, and clinical applications.

Following successful completion of the basic core module, the physician must then complete the advanced module(s) in his or her area of interest. The head and neck module is an eight-hour curriculum that includes:

  • Physics and principles of ultrasound
  • Scanning techniques and normal head/neck ultrasound anatomy
  • Head/neck ultrasound interpretation
  • Interventional head/neck ultrasound

(ACS Web site. Available at www.facs.org/education/ultrasound.html . Accessed January 26, 2007.)

The cost of the ACS certification varies according to level of ACS membership. The cost for the CD-ROM for the basic core module ranges from $90 to $300. The eight-hour head and neck advanced module costs $775.

Dr. O’Malley completed the ACS certification program under the tutelage of Robert A. Sofferman, MD, Head and Neck Module Director. He found the training to be extremely reasonable, easy to learn, easy to apply, and not at all cumbersome. He estimates that following his formal training, it took him only about two months of using ultrasound on his own before he felt very comfortable and proficient at seeing the structures in the neck. He was able to quickly and easily train his nurse and nurse practitioner to set up the equipment and assist him with ultrasound examinations.

Reimbursement

Dr. Akbar et al. concluded that the primary issue regarding proper reimbursement for in-office ultrasound and USFNA is utilization of the correct CPT codes. As with all medical insurance billing, improper coding can result in a significant loss of revenue.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Features Issue: April 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Sialendoscopy More Cost-Effective than Medical Management with Diagnostic Ultrasound for RAIS
  • Communicating with Patients and Staff via Electronic Office Communication Systems
  • Lean Neck Mass Clinic Model Reduces Time to Diagnosis
  • Ultrasound-Guided Needle Dye Injection by Surgeon Localizes Tumor

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939