• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Involvement with Long-Term Disability Insurance, Legal Claims May Hinder Recovery from Chronic Dizziness

by Linda Kossoff • March 15, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

How does symptom recovery from chronic dizziness (CD) in patients receiving/pursuing long-term disability (LTD) insurance or legal claims (LCs) compare with CD recovery in patients who do not receive these things, and what factors might contribute to changes in symptom severity?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Shown Psychometrically Sound in Measuring Disability in Patients with Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
  • Low-Dose Macrolides Can Help Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Chronic Rhinosinusitis Symptom Duration Does Not Affect ESS Outcomes
  • Parosmia Associated with Functional Recovery from Post-Infectious Olfactory Dysfunction
Explore This Issue
March 2022

Patients receiving or pursuing LTD insurance or LCs did not improve from CD and dizziness catastrophizing compared to those who were not.

BACKGROUND: Chronic dizziness arises from vestibular and nonvestibular etiologies and is often associated with psychiatric/psychological comorbidities. Despite a comprehensive, integrated treatment approach, not all CD cases resolve, for a variety of biological and/or psychosocial reasons. One possible recovery barrier is receiving or pursuing LTD insurance compensation or an LC.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING: Multimodal Imaging Group, Research Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction & Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers extracted dizziness-related diagnoses on 195 adults in an outpatient interdisciplinary neurotology clinic. Criteria included baseline Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Dizziness Catastrophizing Scale (DCS) assessments between August 2012 and July 2018 and a mean follow-up visit within approximately 10 months. Participants were categorized as either receiving/pursuing LTD/LC (LTD/LC+, 92 patients) or not (LTD/LC–, 103 patients). Results showed that individuals in the LTD/LC+ group did not appear to improve with CD treatment independent of neurotologic or mental health diagnoses, whereas individuals in the LTD/LC– group responded to interdisciplinary CD treatment, despite both groups having equal access to multiple forms of intervention. The LTD/LC+ group showed 8.0% and 7.6% mean increases in DHI and DCS scores, respectively, whereas LTD/LC– patients showed 21.5% and 25.9% reductions in DHI and DCS scores, respectively, controlling for age, sex, and baseline illness severity. Authors note that most existing data relate to injury/motor vehicle collision claims. Limitations included its retrospective design and the possibility that data might have been influenced by greater baseline illness severity in the LTD/LC+ group.

CITATION: Shah P, Attia M, Dillon WA, et al. Receiving long-term disability or pursuing a legal claim may prevent recovery from chronic dizziness. Laryngoscope. 2022;132:655-661

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: clinical research, dizziness, treatmentIssue: March 2022

You Might Also Like:

  • Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Shown Psychometrically Sound in Measuring Disability in Patients with Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
  • Low-Dose Macrolides Can Help Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Chronic Rhinosinusitis Symptom Duration Does Not Affect ESS Outcomes
  • Parosmia Associated with Functional Recovery from Post-Infectious Olfactory Dysfunction

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939