• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Lawyers Tell Physicians How to Protect Themselves from the Pitfalls of Employment

by Margot Fromer • February 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Gerson then went on to discuss one of the protected groups that Ms. Garr mentioned: people with disabilities. She defined a disability the way the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) does: a physical impairment that substantially limits life activities.

You Might Also Like

  • Employment Contracts Need to Ensure Physicians are Free Agents
  • Part-Time Work Appeals to Increasing Number of Physicians
  • How Reasonable Non-Compete Clauses Can Protect Your Practice
  • Anatomy of a Noncompetition Clause: Now’s the time to review your employment contract
Explore This Issue
February 2008

This definition seems fairly clear until one has to decide who exactly is disabled and to what extent the disability confers protection against discrimination. For example, obesity-even morbid obesity-is not classified as a disability, even though there are many things that obese people cannot do or have great difficulty doing. But loss of a limb, loss of the ability to walk (even permanently needing crutches or a cane), blindness, deafness, and the like are protected conditions.

What must physician employers do to protect themselves against a charge of discrimination under the ADA? The law is, at the same time, clear and not clear. First, the disabled person must be capable of doing the job adequately and safely. For example, a blind man cannot reasonably be an ophthalmologist, but there’s no reason why he can’t be a general pediatrician or an oncologist.

Then, as long as the employee can do the job, the employer must make reasonable accommodation for the disability-for example, removing physical barriers (installing ramps or elevators), providing a computer screen with large type and/or voice enhancement, and allowing the employee’s service dog to come to work.

But accommodating people with disabilities is more than that. It requires looking at how the office is operated, how people treat the one with the disability, how programs are run, and the role of respect and inclusion.

©2008 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Legal Matters, Practice Management Tagged With: employment, guidelines, lawsuits, legal, physician safety, practice management, staffing, workplace issuesIssue: February 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Employment Contracts Need to Ensure Physicians are Free Agents
  • Part-Time Work Appeals to Increasing Number of Physicians
  • How Reasonable Non-Compete Clauses Can Protect Your Practice
  • Anatomy of a Noncompetition Clause: Now’s the time to review your employment contract

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where should ENT publications draw the line on authors' use of generative AI?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Rhinology’s Persistent Gender Gap
  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • When a “Blocked Ear” Isn’t Obstructive ETD
    • What Does It Mean to Be Written by a Human?
    • Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients
    • Vocal Outcomes After COVR in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939