• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Mobile Devices in the Medical Setting Can Lead to Distracted Doctors and Medical Error

by Richard Quinn • September 6, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Kuppersmith likens the distractions of mobile technology to the earliest training college graduates receive in medical school: Prioritize the situation. “Most of us are trained to triage what the most important thing is,” he said. “The nature of what we do, there are interruptions. What channels they come through, I don’t think it really matters.”

You Might Also Like

  • Mobile Computing Can Revolutionize Health Care
  • The ‘Medical Home’: A New Deal for Doctors or Gatekeeper Redux?
  • Protecting Medical Devices against Cyberthreats
  • New Excise Tax Applicable to Otolaryngologist Devices
Explore This Issue
September 2012

Gregory McNeer, Jr., a principal of Stratford Consulting in Winston-Salem, N.C., who recently helped organize a webcast for physicians on the dangers of technology and privacy laws, agrees that judicious use of available technology can counteract the pitfalls. “I’ve seen some doctors who really seem to be surgically attached to what I call their ‘electronic leash,’” he said. “They respond to every buzz and beep and burp they get. They like that; they like the connectedness of it. But I’ve also seen, from my perspective, [that] it degrades the nature of the doctor-patient relationship if they are not able to limit their jumping back and forth between their electronic device and the issue at hand—the patient in front of them.”

The same can even hold true for otolaryngologists who might check a mobile device during surgery, depending on the circumstances. A study in Perfusion, a journal focused on perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their uses in modern cardiac surgery, found that 55 percent of technicians who monitor bypass machines had talked on cell phones during heart surgery (Perfusion. 2011;26;375-380). Half of the study participants said they had texted while in surgery. Yet, roughly 40 percent described talking on the phone during surgery as “always an unsafe practice,” while roughly half expressed the same sentiment about texting while in surgery.

While the study results—and the national attention they garnered in an article in The New York Times—paint a picture of a troubled technological tableau, McNeer said nuance makes all the difference. “It’s just a question of, like so many things, degrees,” he said. “Do you have a man or woman in the middle of a sensitive operation who is constantly looking down at his or her iPhone because it keeps buzzing all the time, or do you have someone who is focused on the task at hand and then, at an appropriate time, steps back, takes a breath, checks her phone and goes back to the patient?”

Mobile Device Usage Guidelines

  1. Know the rules at your workplace. Many practices have privacy rules related to electronic health records. If there are also rules in place in your hospital, clinic or private office on how, when and where physicians can access mobile devices, learn them.
  2. Think of a mobile device as a patient chart. Patient data comes with a raft of privacy concerns, and viewing today’s technology in the same vein as an “old school” chart can help ensure that otolaryngologists do not create a privacy issue.
  3. Limit the number of devices. Many physicians carry multiple devices, including a work phone, a personal phone and maybe a tablet or mobile computer. Interacting with multiple devices and trying to attend to a patient’s needs and questions is just as difficult as it sounds.
  4. Focus on the patient. Avoid texting or reading e-mail in front of a patient, unless absolutely necessary.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Practice Management, Tech Talk Tagged With: computer, mobile device, patient satisfaction, smartphone, technologyIssue: September 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • Mobile Computing Can Revolutionize Health Care
  • The ‘Medical Home’: A New Deal for Doctors or Gatekeeper Redux?
  • Protecting Medical Devices against Cyberthreats
  • New Excise Tax Applicable to Otolaryngologist Devices

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you ever participated in a professional group's advocacy or Hill Day event?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Society Debuts TRIO Leadership Academy
    • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
    • How to Have Effective Presurgical Discussions
    • Advocacy: Finding Our Voice
    • A Royal Family Heritage: The Habsburg Jaw

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939