ENTtoday
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

More of the Same: Why isn’t otolaryngology becoming more diverse?

by H. Steven Sims, MD, FICS • September 3, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Other disciplines have been exemplary. In 2008, the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) requested a panel to lead a workgroup on racial and ethnic diversity in emergency medicine as part of the best practices track.5 The move was not only intentional but integrated into the fabric of what the specialty considers the best practices for the field. Kane and colleagues looked at the trends in workforce diversity for vascular surgery, interventional radiology, interventional cardiology and general surgery.6 These groups were compared with orthopedic surgery because the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery has been intentional, directive and active in pursuit of increased diversity in its specialty.7

You Might Also Like

  • Response from the editor
  • How Otolaryngology Programs Are Working to Create a More Diverse Workforce
  • Change Is Already Here
  • Letter from the Editor: Why We Are Better When We Are Diverse
Explore This Issue
September 2010

Kane’s findings suggest that many programs may have inadvertently met diversity goals by increasing the number of women in their programs. While this is a noble and necessary objective, it sidesteps consideration for the value that socioeconomic and cultural diversity bring to the table. Women represented 14 percent of vascular surgery trainees, while African-American and Hispanic trainees accounted for 4 to 5 percent of all surgeons training in the subspecialty.6 Simply looking at the numbers, one must conclude that Caucasian women have derived more benefit from diversity programs than have other underrepresented groups in vascular surgery.

Returning to our specialty, an analysis of the data from 1996 to 2004 revealed that the population of women in otolaryngology increased from 18.5 percent to 23 percent. For African-Americans, representation fell from 3.6 percent in 1996 to 2.3 percent in 2004.8 For Hispanic and Native American physicians, the amount of data was apparently too small to submit to statistical analysis. These statistics, coupled with the absence of any plan to rectify the problem, lead to some conclusions.

First, there is a dearth of concrete evidence to support an assertion that the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) has any sense of concern or urgency about addressing the problem. It is not clear that there is a feeling of unease or discontent with the status quo. Secondly, there are examples in other specialties of a more decidedly active response. Drawing on the example of our colleagues in orthopedic surgery, perhaps the first and most critical step is recognition of the problem. Mark Gebhardt, MD, a professor of orthopedic surgery at Harvard University Medical School, writes, “Diversifying residency programs positively affects all residents and their ability to deliver care and create positive physician-patient relationships.”7 The author clearly understands that increasing diversity benefits both underrepresented minorities and traditionally represented groups of people. There must be a realization that encompassing myriad cultural backgrounds to create a diverse health care delivery team enhances the team itself as well as the team’s collective ability to provide health care.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Everyday Ethics, Practice Management, Viewpoint Tagged With: AAO-HNS, diversity, medical education, otolaryngology, residents, viewpointIssue: September 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Response from the editor
  • How Otolaryngology Programs Are Working to Create a More Diverse Workforce
  • Change Is Already Here
  • Letter from the Editor: Why We Are Better When We Are Diverse

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Experts Delve into Treatment Options for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Post-Tonsillectomy Taste Disorders Rare but Present
    • Study: Artificial Intelligence Can Help Predict Risk of Thyroid Cancer on Ultrasound
    • Nobel Awards for Otolaryngology Research
    • Visual Abstract Competition to Launch at 2020 Triological Society Sections Meeting
    • More Severe OSA Leads to Higher Blood Pressure in Patients with Resistant Hypertension
    • Link Between Hearing and Cognition Begins Earlier Than Once Thought

Polls

Will registry information and data science improve patient care?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2019 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.