• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New Oral Cavity Cancer Quality Measures Included in Maintenance of Certification (MOC) for Otolaryngologists

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • April 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Otolaryngology Residents Gain Access to Maintenance of Certification Modules
  • If Not Maintenance of Certification, What?
  • From the ABOto: MOC 2012 Update
  • Maintenance of Certification: An Update
Explore This Issue
April 2013
Light micrograph of glottis carcinoma.

A natural outgrowth of the decades-long movement toward evidence-based medicine is an increased focus on the assessment of physician performance in applying the best evidence to diagnose and treat a patient with a specific condition. To this end, quality of care measures are being developed for specific conditions within most specialties to guide physicians and assess their performance in implementing the best care based on the most up-to-date evidence.

Two current initiatives offer otolaryngologists a way to join the growing ranks of physicians in other specialties who are using quality measures to assess their performance. In 2008, the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) launched quality of care measures for oral cavity cancer. In February 2013, the American Board of Otolaryngology (ABOto) rolled out a Performance Improvement Module (PIM) on oral cavity cancer that uses the AHNS quality measures. The PIM is one component of Part IV of the Maintenance of Certificattion (MOC) program offered by ABOto.

“The aim of both initiatives is to provide feedback to otolaryngologists on their strengths as well as on areas that need improvement in diagnosing and treating patients with oral cavity cancers,” said Robert H. Miller, MD, executive director of ABOto and physician editor of ENTtoday, who hopes physicians will participate in the initiatives in the spirit in which they were developed, not as a stick but as a carrot to encourage participation to improve performance and, ultimately, patient outcomes.

Oral Cavity Cancer Quality Care Measures

The oral cavity cancer quality care measures developed by the AHNS include quality measures in three areas: pre-treatment, treatment and post-treatment. Key pre-treatment measures are the need for pathologic confirmation of disease, appropriate TNM staging documentation and tobacco cessation counseling. Key treatment measures are radiation oncology referral for all patients with advanced T stage or metastatic lymph node disease, and referral to a medical oncologist and a radiation oncologist for all patients with positive pathologic margins or metastatic lymph nodes showing extracapsular extension. Key post-treatment measures are the need for follow-up visits for symptom management and for recurrence and second primary tumor

surveillance, and assessment of serum thyroid stimulating hormone level within 12 months for patients treated with radiation therapy to the neck to detect hypothyroidism.

According to Amy Chen, professor of head and neck surgery at Atlanta’s Emory University, who chaired the AHNS multidisciplinary committee that developed the quality measures, oral cavity cancer was the first disease to be chosen to develop these measures because the committee wanted to pick a condition that is commonly seen by otolaryngologists and is a surgical condition handled by members of the AHNS on a daily basis.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Practice Focus, Special Reports Tagged With: maintenance of certification, oral cavity cancerIssue: April 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Otolaryngology Residents Gain Access to Maintenance of Certification Modules
  • If Not Maintenance of Certification, What?
  • From the ABOto: MOC 2012 Update
  • Maintenance of Certification: An Update

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939