• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Reimbursement and Outcome Measurement in Otolaryngology Practices: What the Government Can Do to You and for You

by Margot Fromer • January 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

He then went on to discuss the successes of the Department of Veterans Affairs health system, which was turned on its ear by the 1994 appointment of Kenneth Kizer, MD, as Undersecretary for Health. The VA now scores better than almost all other national health care institutions because Ken Kizer initiated a significant amount of institutional change, said Dr. Eibling.

You Might Also Like

  • PQRI: ‘We’re from the Government, and We’re Here to Help’
  • Developing Quality Measures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
  • Letter from the Editor: How 2021 CMS Reimbursement Changes Will Affect Otolaryngology
  • Case Studies: Malpractice or Bad Outcome?
Explore This Issue
January 2008

Dr. Kizer has left the VA and is now President and CEO of Medsphere Systems Corporation in Aliso Viejo, CA, but he has spoken about his experiences at the VA and how he instituted the changes that vastly improved the quality of care provided in that system-which used to be one of the worst in the country.

Before 1995, the VA health care system was focused on the episodic treatment of illness, largely through hospitals and specialists, said Dr. Eibling. The system was composed of independent, competing medical centers. There was too much interfacility variation in care delivery and outcomes. Staff was demoralized and veterans found care too difficult to access. Management of the VA health care system was centralized and hierarchical with minor decisions being made at the highest level. The administration was beset by reams of rigid policies and procedures, and it was inwardly focused and perhaps not adequately funded.

Dr. Eibling discussed Dr. Kizer’s enumeration of the critical factors he established and used to improve delivery of quality health care in a fiscally responsible way:

  • Clarity of vision. Three strategic goals drove the transformation: creation of a seamless continuum of care, consistency of superior quality, and predictability of good value.
  • A new organizational model. Veterans Integrated Service Networks are an organized set of treatment facilities, caregivers, and support services that have a collective goal of delivering services to a defined population in a coordinated and collaborative manner that maximizes the health care value of the service.
  • Operational restructuring. Changes included universal primary care, care management, standardized benefits, telephone-linked care, and a shift from hospital-based to outpatient care.
  • Funding changes. This was accomplished by implementation of a capitation-based resource allocation system in which basic care accounted for 96% of patients and 62% of funds, whereas complex care accounted for 4% of patients and 38% of funds.
  • Information management. This strategy included electronic medical records, which eliminated 72% of all forms, the rest of which became automated. Each patient was given a universal access and identification card.
  • Performance management. This strategy aligned the new vision and mission of the VA with quantifiable strategic goals, identifying performance indicators for the goals and holding managers accountable for achieving results.

By closing unused beds, reducing bed days, decreasing hospital admissions, increasing ambulatory care visits, and decreasing staffing, 80% of VA users are now more satisfied than they were two years previously. Significant improvements were achieved in all areas of care-outpatient, inpatient, surgical morbidity and mortality, and preventive care.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Health Policy, Practice Focus, Practice Management Tagged With: cancer, healthcare reform, Medicare, outcomes, policy, Quality, radiation, reimbursement, research, treatmentIssue: January 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • PQRI: ‘We’re from the Government, and We’re Here to Help’
  • Developing Quality Measures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
  • Letter from the Editor: How 2021 CMS Reimbursement Changes Will Affect Otolaryngology
  • Case Studies: Malpractice or Bad Outcome?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939