• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Should Surgery Be First-Line Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer?

by Margot J. Fromer • March 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Head and neck cancer specialists are increasingly advocating surgery alone-or at least as first-line treatment. Often, patients with small tumors, and even some with larger ones, can avoid the well-known and significantly life-altering toxicity of chemoradiation.

You Might Also Like

  • Is Speech Language Pathologist Evaluation Necessary in the Non-Operative Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Most Patients with Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma in National Cancer Database Receive Radiation as First-Line Treatment
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer
Explore This Issue
March 2009

Is this a reasonable clinical idea? It’s a huge question, said Jonas T. Johnson, MD, Chairman of the Department of Otolaryngology at University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.

Christine Gourin, MD, Associate Professor and Director of the Clinical Research Program in Head and Neck Cancer at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore, agreed. The major determinants of whether surgery is an effective treatment are histology and stage. If the tumor is low-grade and/or early-stage, surgery alone can be curative, she said.

Bruce T. Haughey, MBChBFor small tumors, surgery is very efficient and cost-effective, and it allows patients to get back to their usual lives faster than with chemoradiation. Surgery carries few lingering after-effects, and there are lots of arguments in its favor.

-Bruce T. Haughey, MBChB

Bruce H. Haughey, MBChB, Kimbrough Professor of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Director of the Head and Neck Cancer Center at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, added that this is a serious debate. For small tumors, surgery is very efficient and cost-effective, and it allows patients to get back to their usual lives faster than with chemoradiation. Surgery carries few lingering after-effects, and there are lots of arguments in its favor.

In a Nutshell

We never give chemotherapy or chemoradiation (CRT) for stage 1 or stage 2 disease, simply because it is not required, said Dr. Johnson. The biologic costs are too great, and there are no data to show that chemo provides a benefit in early-stage disease. It’s just too much treatment.

For example, in some patients, endoscopic resection of the larynx, which can be done on an outpatient basis, is more effective and efficient than six weeks of radiation.

Dr. Gourin agreed with him about early laryngeal cancer but warned that all head and neck cancer patients have a high lifelong risk of second such cancers. The ability to hold radiation in reserve for the future is a huge potential benefit of primary surgery for early-stage cancer, she noted.

But what about patients who want chemo and/or radiation after surgery to destroy micrometastases? Dr. Johnson replied, Currently, we have no way to find metastatic disease before it becomes detectable, so there’s no point in giving highly toxic drugs for the very unlikely event of distant metastasis. Thus, only patients with advanced tumors should be offered adjuvant CRT.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck Issue: March 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Is Speech Language Pathologist Evaluation Necessary in the Non-Operative Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Most Patients with Early Stage Glottic Carcinoma in National Cancer Database Receive Radiation as First-Line Treatment
  • Chemoradiation vs. Surgery: Which is Better for Head and Neck Cancer?
  • Targeted Therapy a Potential Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939