• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Situation Critical: Otolaryngologists See Diminishing Returns for Taking Emergency Call

by Gretchen Henkel • June 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

“There’s nothing worse than taking call and looking after a patient at a hospital, and then having them transferred to their Kaiser Permanente doctor who was not on call that night.” – Steven P. Davison, MD, DDS

You Might Also Like

  • Pay4Call: Economic, Ethical, and Quality Issues of Payment for Taking Call: Physicians Angry at Lack of Payment
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
  • Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons Urged: Be Part of the Solution in Health Care Reform
  • Borrowing 101: Minimize risk when taking out a loan for your practice
Explore This Issue
June 2006
Figure. A variety of factors including declining reimbursements, insurance hurdles, and malpractice liability are causing otolaryngologists—head and neck surgeons to opt out of taking emergency room call. This Special Report explores these factors and possible solutions to the “on-call crisis.”

click for large version
Figure. A variety of factors including declining reimbursements, insurance hurdles, and malpractice liability are causing otolaryngologists—head and neck surgeons to opt out of taking emergency room call. This Special Report explores these factors and possible solutions to the “on-call crisis.”

No Dollars for Private Practice Physicians

Even though emergency rooms are overburdened by uninsured patients, hospitals receive subsidies which do not extend to individual physicians and subspecialists, pointed out Steven P. Davison, MD, DDS, Assistant Professor of Plastic Surgery at Georgetown University Hospital in Washington, DC. “The hospitals have an avenue for funding,” said Dr. Davison. “Portions of Medicaid or indemnity from car insurance are virtually—sucked up’ by the hospital in the first 24 hours. But none of that trickles down to the private practice, or fee for service, physicians.”

“For hospitals,” continued Dr. Davison, “the emergency room is becoming and bigger and bigger archway for a source of admissions [and income]. They do get paid [for patients in the ER]—not much, often—and they have an avenue for funding. If they didn’t, they’d shut their ERs.”

What hospitals do to maintain their ER certification, said Dr. Davison, is to hire physicians who “do the bulk of the heavy lifting” for ER coverage: trauma surgeons, intensivists, and orthopedists are often on staff. But hospitals are paying less and less for the incidental coverage they are also required to offer: otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, plastic surgery, ophthalmology, and oral surgery, for instance. Depending on the hospital and the region, some may demand that these subspecialists take call in return for retaining hospital privileges, a situation Dr. Davison calls a restriction of trade.

“At our hospital, it’s not a practicebuilder for ENTs to take ER call. We see a lot of abscesses, bleeding, and facial trauma in our ER, but not your bread-and-butter sinus and ear cases.” – Mary Talley Bowden, MD

Norman J. Harris, MD, an otolaryngologist–head and neck surgeon in private practice in Fullerton, Calif., agrees with this analysis. “The drive [for hospitals] to keep people on call is no longer a function of need in the community,” he said. “It’s a function of certification to be a paramedic receiving station, which gives them access to various kinds of income for indigent patients. But that [income] does not get passed through to physicians.”

Spiraling Downward

The managed care environment, especially in states such as California, has compounded the problem. Patients in managed care plans who go to the emergency room and are seen by an on-call specialist will most likely be transferred to an in-plan physician for follow-up care. Furthermore, the insurance company may often contest the on-call specialist’s billing for his or her services.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page

Filed Under: Career Development, Departments, Health Policy, Medical Education, Practice Management Tagged With: cost, emergency, EMTALA, healthcare reform, insurance, legal, malpractice, Medicare, policy, reimbursementIssue: June 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Pay4Call: Economic, Ethical, and Quality Issues of Payment for Taking Call: Physicians Angry at Lack of Payment
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
  • Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons Urged: Be Part of the Solution in Health Care Reform
  • Borrowing 101: Minimize risk when taking out a loan for your practice

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939