• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Stimulated Raman Histology a Promising Adjunct, Alternative to Frozen Section in Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumor Diagnosis

by Linda Kossoff • November 15, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

How accurate is intraoperative stimulated Raman histology (SRH) technology in producing images in a novel range of sinonasal and skull base tumors compared to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • Moderate Discrepancy Between Frozen Section and Permanent Section Analysis of Squamous Cell Carcinomas Margins
  • Frozen Section Margins Highly Accurate in Predicting Final Margin Status in HN Cancer
  • Novel Bioabsorbable Plate Associated with Lower Leak Risk in Patients Receiving Endoscopic Skull Base Repair
  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treats Skull Base Tumors: Part 2 of
Explore This Issue
November 2022

Stimulated Raman histology can rapidly produce images similar to FFPE H&E in sinonasal and skull base tumors and may be an adjunct or alternative to standard frozen sampling (FS).

BACKGROUND: Margin assessment and diagnosis of tumors in sinonasal and skull base surgery is challenging due to these tumors’ multiple histological subtypes. There is, therefore, a need for improved histology methods. SRH is an emerging technology using laser spectroscopy and color-matching algorithms to enable rapid intraoperative acquisition of histological images.

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study.

SETTING: Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers sought to describe the novel application of SRH across a broader spectrum of skull base pathologies than previously described. Their cohort included 12 patients (median age 62 years, 66.7% female) undergoing sinonasal or skull base surgery using an SRH system and taking place at a single academic cancer center from June 2020 to September 2021. In total, 67 SRH images from seven tumor types were assessed. The tumor was identified in 100% of lesional specimens, with characteristic diagnostic features readily appreciable on SRH. Diagnosis using SRH was faster than FS (4.3 minutes versus 44.5 minutes). In matched sample sites, the diagnoses for both methods matched 93.8% of the time. Overall, similar concordance between SRH and FS was seen in sensitivity, specificity, precision, and overall accuracy. However, researchers noted that certain diagnostic features that can be assessed on FS may not be readily apparent in SRH images, such as the features of a mitotic figure versus apoptotic cell, and that designating tissue as malignant versus benign might be a more realistic application for SRH. Study limitations included the small sample size.

CITATION: Fitzgerald CWR, Dogan S, Bou-Nassif R, et al. Stimulated Raman histology for rapid intra-operative diagnosis of sinonasal and skull base tumors. Laryngoscope. 2022;132:2142-2147.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Tagged With: head and neck cancer, treatmentIssue: November 2022

You Might Also Like:

  • Moderate Discrepancy Between Frozen Section and Permanent Section Analysis of Squamous Cell Carcinomas Margins
  • Frozen Section Margins Highly Accurate in Predicting Final Margin Status in HN Cancer
  • Novel Bioabsorbable Plate Associated with Lower Leak Risk in Patients Receiving Endoscopic Skull Base Repair
  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treats Skull Base Tumors: Part 2 of

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939