• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The Rewards and Dilemmas of Surgical Missions

by Gretchen Henkel • June 7, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • New Technique Uses Umbilical Cord Stem Cells for Early Cleft Palate Repair
  • Challenges and Rewards of a Physician Executive Career
  • State of the Art in Tonsillectomy
  • New Department, Everyday Ethics, Examines Ethical Dilemmas in Otolaryngology
Explore This Issue
June 2012

Dr. Buckmiller is associate professor in the department of otolaryngology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, and director, Vascular Anomalies Center of Excellence and Cleft Lip and Palate Team at the Arkansas Children’s Hospital in Little Rock.

Q: Are there times, due perhaps to incomplete screening procedures, lack of adequate resources or appropriate follow-up care, when you must tell patients and their families—who might have traveled hundreds of miles to see you—that the surgery they want cannot be safely done?

K. Christopher McMains, MD: I have done surgical trips to Peru, Nicaragua and Iraq, in association with non-governmental organizations as well as those co-sponsored by the State Department and the in-country Ministry of Health. I do mostly rhinology, which is an equipment-intensive activity in the U.S. Often, you do not have all of those medical devices at your disposal in the host country. You feel the pressure of all eyes looking to you, especially when you also know that you cannot reschedule the surgery for another day. Sometimes you have to say, “Given what we have at our disposal, I cannot in good faith undertake this [procedure].” And that’s both humbling and disappointing to everyone involved. The same is true for a procedure that requires follow-up: Unless there is someone with whom you’ve established a partnership, trust and ability to communicate, it’s best, in my mind, to just not go there surgically.

Dr. McMains, MD, is clinical associate professor at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio, and chief of otolaryngology at South Texas Veterans Health Care System.

Q: How do you keep from feeling overwhelmed by the need for your help in these countries?

Susan R. Cordes, MD: There is so much need when you go on a surgical trip. You always feel good about the patients you’ve taken care of, but you also feel bad about the ones that you don’t. I’ve now traveled to Kenya six times, as part of AMPATH, a reciprocal partnership between North American academic centers led by Indiana University, working in concert with the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital in Eldoret, Kenya. Although the AMPATH program has been in existence since 1989, I was the first ENT to go.

We have established a relationship with the otolaryngologists there to build up their department and have a more lasting impact. For me, that is very professionally rewarding, and a lot easier for me mentally to be able to look at the long-range picture. We work side by side with the Kenyan otolaryngologists; we raise money to bring them here for additional training; and we let them guide us about the areas they want to work on. For example, for one visit they wanted to work on sinuses. So we brought equipment, they recruited patients and we left the equipment there. More importantly, we left them with the training to use it. What keeps me going is thinking that if we keep this momentum going, we will get to the point where we can narrow down the number of cases they need us to do.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Career Development, Departments, Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Pediatric, Practice Focus Tagged With: cleft palate, facial, interview, outcomes, pediatrics, reconstructive surgery, surgical missionIssue: June 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • New Technique Uses Umbilical Cord Stem Cells for Early Cleft Palate Repair
  • Challenges and Rewards of a Physician Executive Career
  • State of the Art in Tonsillectomy
  • New Department, Everyday Ethics, Examines Ethical Dilemmas in Otolaryngology

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939