• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The State of the Art of Image-Guided Surgery

by Pippa Wysong • November 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Where the standard of care can fall down is if the surgeon doesn’t perform the appropriate diagnostic workup-such as not doing a sinus CT prior to sinus surgery-or if there is inappropriate medical treatment or a failure to discuss the risks, benefits, and alternative to surgery with the patient.

You Might Also Like

  • How Image-Guided Surgery Can Benefit Otolaryngology
  • State-of-the-Art Techniques Are Tempting, but May Not Improve Care
  • Intraoperative Volume CT Demonstrates Appeal, but Questions Remain
  • State of the Art in Tonsillectomy
Explore This Issue
November 2006

IGS can help you identify and confirm landmarks that you should be aware of. But you have to know what to do when you get there, Dr. Parikh said. Also, use of IGS needs to be well documented, clarifying medical necessity.

History of IGS

Richard Lebowitz, MD, Assistant Professor of Otolaryngology at the New York University School of Medicine, described some of the history behind the development of IGS. Original devices developed decades ago required rigid fixation of the head and were trajectory-based.

By the mid-1980s, frameless stereotactic surgery came into play, and had a position-sensitive articulated arm (wands). In the mid-1990s IGS progressed to having optical localizers, electromagnetic tracking, and were frameless, allowing for head mobility. At this point, the technology also no longer required use of wands, allowing for greater mobility of instruments.

Then there was a boom in technology, driven by surgeons’ needs, Dr. Lebowitz said. Recent years have seen several advances in endoscopic surgery devices. Now, IGS is used in revision surgery, extended frontal sinus surgery, tumor resection, skull base surgery, endoneurosurgery, and more.

Surgical instruments have become more refined as well. There are straight or curved microdebriders and drills, sinuplasty balloons, and frontal sinus and neurosurgical instruments.

Along with these are advances in CT, MRI, ultrasound, and fluoroscanning, each of which offers ever increasing details. Added to this, there is now the fusing of images, 3D volume rendering, and virtual image updates that are continually getting faster. Versions of these imaging devices are smaller and mobile, and can also be used intraoperatively.

IGS instrumentations now include compatible microdebriders-drills, universal instrument adapter systems, and even flexible instruments such as catheters and stents that can be used with hollow core sensors. In addition, ENTs have rotatable curved suction that does not require recalibration as the tip position changes.

We’ve seen big changes over the past decade, the next ten years will see even more more dramatic changes, said Dr. Lebowitz. One area to watch for is the development of robotic arms that can be used in conjunction with IGS. In future, it may open the door to things such as remote FESS, where the arm and patient are in one city, and the surgeon in another.

Limitations

The endoscope is a great instrument for us, but it’s not perfect, cautioned Brent Senior, MD, Chief of Rhinology, Allergy, and Sinus Surgery at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. One difficulty lies in limits in the perspective the surgeon gets-along with problems of orientation and distortion.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Medical Education, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Tech Talk Tagged With: AAO-HNS, CT, functional endoscopic sinus surgery, IGS, Imaging, outcomes, residents, surgery, technology, training, treatmentIssue: November 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • How Image-Guided Surgery Can Benefit Otolaryngology
  • State-of-the-Art Techniques Are Tempting, but May Not Improve Care
  • Intraoperative Volume CT Demonstrates Appeal, but Questions Remain
  • State of the Art in Tonsillectomy

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939