• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Transoral Laser Resection for Early Glottic Cancer

by Jennifer Decker Arevalo, MA • March 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The final local control with the laser alone was 100% for patients with initially positive margins, 95% for those with initially suspicious margins and 94% for those with free margins. Organ preservation was 100% for patients with positive or suspicious margins and 96% for those with free margins.

You Might Also Like

  • Laser Treatment Resolves Glottic Cancer in a Pilot Study
  • Laser, Radiotherapy Appear Similar in Oncologic Outcomes for Glottic Cancer
  • Cost Analysis of Transoral Surgery versus XRT for Early-Stage Glottic Cancer
  • Transoral Laser Microsurgery Favored Over Radiotherapy in T1 Glottic Carcinoma Survival
Explore This Issue
March 2008

Margin status (p = 0.39), cordectomy type (p = 0.67), and anterior commissure involvement (p = 0.16) were not statistically related to recurrence; however, the recurrence rate was significantly higher for pT1b tumors (p = 0.001).

A second look procedure was performed less than one month following the initial surgery in three cases of suspicious margins. The excisional biopsies performed during the second procedure were all negative, confirming a negative margin status. None of these patients had local recurrence.

Analysis and Recommendations

In light of our experience, we believe that the pathologist’s evaluation of resection margins should be interpreted according to the surgeon’s intraoperative impression of the quality of the resection, said Dr. Hartl. If there is any discrepancy between the surgeon’s impressions and the pathologist’s report, then a ‘second look’ procedure with excisional biopsies should be performed. Another option is a close follow-up with fiberoptic laryngoscopy.

We tend to follow patients with suspicious resection margins every month in our clinic, continued Dr. Hartl. There is no evidence from our study or from the literature that adjuvant radiation therapy is indicated in the case of positive margins and even less evidence for patients with suspicious margins.

Based on our results, we believe that transoral laser microresection is a reliable treatment with high local control and laryngeal preservation for early glottic cancer, Dr. Hartl said. Positive or suspicious margins were not related to the rate of recurrence, nor was anterior commissure involvement. Suspicious margins can be managed with a ‘watch and wait’ attitude and retreatment using the laser; external partial laryngectomy or radiation therapy remain therapeutic options for laryngeal preservation in case of local recurrence or metachronous primary malignancy.

United Healthcare’s Deadline Extended

Citing constructive and collegial feedback from physicians in our network, United Healthcare has extended its March 1 deadline for facility imaging accreditation until the third quarter of this year (see To Accredit or Not to Accredit? ENT Today, February 2008, p. 8). No specific date in the third quarter has yet been established.

The accreditation initiative, which United Healthcare has undertaken in conjunction with the American College of Radiology and the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, aims to bring equipment (including CT, MRI, PET, and other imaging equipment), technologists, physicians, and facilities into compliance with uniform performance standards. Physicians who are part of the UHC network will be required to have obtained accreditation as a condition for reimbursement for these imaging procedures. For more information about the accreditation programs, go to www.acr.org or www.intersocietal.org .

To Reach ENT Today

For Editorial, Permissions, or Publishing Matters: ENT Today, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 333 7th Avenue, 19th Floor, New York, NY 10001, Phone: (646) 674-6544, Fax: (646) 674-6500, ENToday@lwwny.com

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Laryngology, Medical Education, Practice Focus, Tech Talk Tagged With: cancer, carcinoma, CT, laser, outcomes, research, surgery, technology, treatment, tumorIssue: March 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Laser Treatment Resolves Glottic Cancer in a Pilot Study
  • Laser, Radiotherapy Appear Similar in Oncologic Outcomes for Glottic Cancer
  • Cost Analysis of Transoral Surgery versus XRT for Early-Stage Glottic Cancer
  • Transoral Laser Microsurgery Favored Over Radiotherapy in T1 Glottic Carcinoma Survival

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939