• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Allergy Research Gets High Evidence-Based Medicine Rankings

by Paula Moyer • March 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Several treatments for allergy-related disease have high-quality evidence to support them, according to panelists at a seminar in Chicago at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS), which focused on evidence-based medicine as the model applies to allergy.

You Might Also Like

  • Evidence-Based Medicine: Adjusting to a Culture Shift in Health Care
  • FDA Approves First Sublingual Allergy Immunotherapy Agents
  • Is Aspirin Desensitization Indicated for Treatment of Recalcitrant CRSwNP in AERD?
  • A New Direction for Sleep: New OSA guidelines fuel another evidence-based medicine debate
Explore This Issue
March 2009

Importantly, evidence of high quality, such as randomized, placebo-controlled trials, supports certain treatments that are established and others that are newer. For example, the evidence for allergy immunotherapy desensitization is quite strong, and it is also promising for novel treatments-for instance, monoclonal antibodies such as omalizumab (Xolair) for treatment-resistant disease and desensitization therapy for aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD).

There is a lot of misinformation that we need to try to clarify in an effort to give recommendations about how to manage patients that is based on scientific merit, said Richard C. Haydon, MD, in a phone interview. In the last 10 to 12 years, much more attention has been paid to the science behind the management of allergy patients than before. The literature and guidelines are available in many different subjects related to allergy. We are paying attention to the evidence-based literature.

Dr. Haydon, who moderated the AAO-HNS session, is Associate Professor of Surgery in Otolaryngology at the University of Kentucky in Lexington, is also the Chair of the Allergy and Immunology Committee of AAO- HNS, and is President of the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy (AAOA).

Aspirin Desensitization More Accessible

The new information regarding the treatment of AERD with desensitization therapy is particularly intriguing, Dr. Haydon said. AERD often occurs in people who have Samter’s triad: asthma, nasal polyps, and sensitivity to aspirin.

Aspirin desensitization of AERD is a welcome breakthrough, said K. Christopher McMains, MD, Assistant Professor of Otolaryngology at the University of Texas Health Sciences Center in San Antonio. He noted that both the patients with AERD and the physicians who treat them have been frustrated by the limited options of long-term steroids and repeat surgeries to treat recurrent polyps. Other treatments have included antileukotrienes and cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, with mixed results.

Douglas E. Dawson, MD, MSNot all evidence is created equal. The criteria of ranking evidence can help otolaryngologists in the management of allergy because we now have very specific recommendations for treating patients with immunotherapy.

-Douglas E. Dawson, MD, MS

Aspirin desensitization consists of gradual increases of oral doses of aspirin, followed by a daily maintenance dose. The treatment has historically been dangerous and therefore done only in a facility with advanced cardiac and ventilator support, with the physician at the bedside at the time of the first challenge and at the time of the first reaction.

However, new research has shown that inpatient treatment is necessary for patients with risk factors such as beta-blocker use and recent myocardial infarction, as well as any other medical condition or drug treatment that would make the management of severe asthma or anaphylactoid reaction difficult. Such conditions would include severe asthma as well as a history of severe or life-threatening reactions to either aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Outpatient desensitization is possible if the following conditions are met:

  • A physician experienced in the assessment and treatment of patients with acute, severe asthma exacerbations is immediately available.
  • Medically qualified personnel with such experience are available to monitor the patient.
  • At least one of these personnel can be dedicated solely to the individual patient being treated for the full course of desensitization.
  • Resuscitation equipment is available.

 

The increased availability of aspirin desensitization, with the outpatient setting option, is exciting because this is a way of treating patients that is holistic and systemic, said Dr. Haydon.

Monoclonal Antibodies Show Potential

Monoclonal antibody therapy for allergic disease is an example of a new approach for which high-quality evidence is accumulating, Dr. Haydon said in his own presentation. At this point, there is only one FDA-approved monoclonal antibody of a disease relevant to otolaryngology, he said in reference to omalizumab (Xolair). Omalizumab is an antibody that is specific to immunoglobulin E (IgE), the molecule involved in allergic reactions. The goal is for omalizumab to bind with the body’s IgE before an allergic reaction can develop. Currently, omalizumab is approved only for the treatment of asthma, although high-quality trials are showing that it may also be effective for rhinitis and for peanut allergy.

Dr. Haydon said that other monoclonal antibody therapies may also control allergic disease, including those approved for other indications. Examples are tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors that are approved for rheumatoid arthritis, such as infliximab (Remicade) and etanercept (Enbrel). Additionally, investigational agents are still in the pipeline. Monoclonal antibodies change the immune system in a natural and nondestructive way, so that we can combat the immunologic disorders that cause allergies and other immunologic disease, Dr. Haydon said in his interview. They interact with proteins and are therefore large molecules. Conventional allergy therapies such as antihistamines are small molecules and are therefore excreted quickly. Monoclonal antibodies recognize an enemy, a specific protein. They recognize a template, and only that template.

The most common monoclonal antibodies, such as omalizumab, have been humanized after having been removed from mouse models. Although the mouse genetic material has been removed, some investigators are exploring ways to bypass the mouse model and therefore reduce the potential for allergic reactions in susceptible individuals, according to Dr. Haydon.

There is a lot of evidence-based data on the treatment of allergic disease, said panelist Douglas E. Dawson, MD, MS, an otolaryngologist in private practice in Muscatine, IA. In this seminar we wanted to look at new approaches in allergy and present the evidence-based medicine focused on these approaches, he said in a phone interview.

He said the seminar was timely because several aspects of allergy and immunology research have recently been subjected to evidence ranking. In addition to advances in allergy treatment, Dr. Dawson noted the progress in immunology, as presented in the seminar by Dr. McMains.

Vaccine Update

In his presentation, Dr. McMains noted that the vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) (Gardasil) has been proven effective and is now approved as a prevention against HPV, strains of which are a major risk factor for cervical cancer. Interestingly, though, the vaccine approach has been disappointing against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

The seminar was a reminder that not all evidence is created equal, Dr. Dawson said. The criteria of ranking evidence can help otolaryngologists in the management of allergy because we now have very specific recommendations for treating patients with immunotherapy. When subjected to evidence ranking in a meta-analysis funded by the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the evidence in favor of allergy immunotherapy received the highest possible grading. The study provided a foundation for the Second Update of the Practice Parameter for Allergen Immunotherapy (2003, 2007, respectively).

The evidence-based model can be used to educate patients so that they can more astutely assess information that they encounter regarding allergies, particularly in the area of complementary and alternative medicine, Dr. Dawson said. You can help patients gauge the quality of the information, he said. He noted that guidelines give the patient concrete evidence that can help them be players in treatment decisions. They can then be more confident that their medication has been proven to have a good chance of helping them.

To Reach ENT Today

For Editorial, Permissions, or

Publishing Matters:

ENT Today

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

333 7th Avenue, 19th Floor

New York, NY 10001

Phone: (646) 674-6544

Fax: (646) 674-6500

ENToday@lwwny.com

For Advertising Sales:

Martha McGarity

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

333 7th Avenue, 19th Floor

New York, NY 10001

Phone: (646) 674-6535

Fax: (646) 674-6502

martha.mcgarity@wolterskluwer.com

©2009 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Allergy, Medical Education Issue: March 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Evidence-Based Medicine: Adjusting to a Culture Shift in Health Care
  • FDA Approves First Sublingual Allergy Immunotherapy Agents
  • Is Aspirin Desensitization Indicated for Treatment of Recalcitrant CRSwNP in AERD?
  • A New Direction for Sleep: New OSA guidelines fuel another evidence-based medicine debate

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939