• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Balloon Sinuplasty Use Continues to Evolve: Procedure may complement traditional sinus surgery

by Jennifer L.W. Fink • November 5, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Added Expense

Because balloon sinuplasty requires disposable equipment, its cost is typically higher than that of FESS. That additional cost is causing some physicians and hospitals to rethink their use of the procedure.

You Might Also Like

  • The Role of Balloon Catheter Sinuplasty in Pediatric Sinus Disease
  • Does Balloon Catheter Sinuplasty Have a Role in the Surgical Management of Pediatric Sinus Disease?
  • Surgical Approaches to Sinus Disease: The Debate Continues
  • WATCH THIS: Rhinologists Debate Challenges of Office Balloon Sinuplasty
Explore This Issue
November 2011

“The cost of the disposables for doing balloon dilatation is often over $1,000 per case,” Dr. Metson said. “Let’s say you have a hospital whose profit margin might be $1,000 or less per case. That can take a profitable procedure and make it a nonprofitable one for a hospital. Because of that, I know many of my fellow physicians are getting heavy pressure from their hospitals to reduce the number of balloon sinuplasty cases.”

Dr. Metson believes that the procedure’s high costs, coupled with potentially higher reimbursement rates for out-of-hospital procedures, is at least partly behind the drive toward in-office balloon sinuplasty.

The Future

One thing seems clear: Balloon technology will continue to be part of sinus surgery in the foreseeable future. Patient demand, coupled with clinical investigations into additional uses of the technology, will make balloon dilatation a must-have skill for most sinus surgeons.

“This is a very significant new technology that’s being used in the management of sinus disease,” Dr. Setzen said. “I would say that anybody doing endoscopic sinus surgery today needs to be at least trained and aware and knowledgeable about the use of the balloon.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Rhinology, Special Reports, Tech Talk Tagged With: balloon sinuplasty, FESS, otolaryngology, surgeryIssue: November 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • The Role of Balloon Catheter Sinuplasty in Pediatric Sinus Disease
  • Does Balloon Catheter Sinuplasty Have a Role in the Surgical Management of Pediatric Sinus Disease?
  • Surgical Approaches to Sinus Disease: The Debate Continues
  • WATCH THIS: Rhinologists Debate Challenges of Office Balloon Sinuplasty

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you used AI to submit documentation to insurance companies in response to a denial?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Vocal Cord Leukoplakia Management Trends Include Advanced Surgical Techniques, Voice Preservation
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • What Is the Extent of Neck Dissection in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • The Battle of the Bots Comes to Prior Authorization
    • How to Avoid These 10 Difficult Airway Pitfalls
    • Getting Comfortable Being Uncomfortable
    • Comparative Study of TMRT for Chronic Otitis Media
    • Early and Sustained Improvements in Sense of Smell with Tezepelumab Treatment in Patients with CRSwNP (WAYPOINT)

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939