• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: Time to Test Newborns?

by Jennifer L.W. Fink • July 1, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

However, it’s difficult to determine exactly how many, primarily because CMV-associated hearing loss often is not apparent until a child is 2 years of age or older, and at that point, it’s next to impossible to determine whether CMV infection was present at birth. Because CMV is so endemic in the population, CMV testing must occur before three weeks of age to accurately determine if the infection was congenital.

You Might Also Like

  • Do Antivirals Improve Hearing Outcomes in Neonates with Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection?
  • Early Cytomegalovirus Testing Can Detect Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Very Young Children
  • Should Infants Who Fail their Newborn Hearing Screen Undergo Cytomegalovirus Testing?
  • Diagnosis and Management of Congenital Hearing Loss
Explore This Issue
July 2014

A 2007 review of more than 11 studies determined that 15% to 20% of cases of profound bilateral hearing loss are associated with congenital CMV infection (J Clin Virol. 2008;41:57-62). A 10-year prospective study of more than 14,000 infants found a 0.53% prevalence of congenital CMV infection; of those, 22% developed SNHL (J Pediatr. 2008;153:84-88). Albert Park, MD, section chief for pediatric otolaryngology at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, recently conducted a soon-to-be-published five-year retrospective study that concluded that “approximately 30% of the children we saw for pediatric hearing loss showed either confirmed or probable diagnosis for CMV.”

CMV-associated hearing loss is progressive and can fluctuate. In a 1997 study of children with congenital CMV, 50% of infants with demonstrated hearing loss at birth experienced further deterioration of hearing, with the median age of first progression 18 months (J Pediatr. 1997;130:624-630). Delayed-onset SNHL occurred in 18.2% of the children, and the median age of detection was 27 months.

CMV Testing Can Direct Monitoring and Treatment

Currently, practitioners in Utah, Ohio, parts of Massachusetts, and elsewhere are using CMV testing to evaluate and direct the treatment of newborns who fail to pass their newborn hearing screening. “In Utah, the testing requirement is based on the failure of two hearing screenings,” said Stephanie Browning McVicar, AuD, CCC-A, director of Utah’s Early Hearing Detection and Intervention program in Salt Lake City. An infant who fails his in-hospital newborn hearing screen will be re-screened at 10 to 14 days of age, often at the hospital of birth. Children who fail that second screening are scheduled for diagnostic auditory brainstem response testing and the child’s pediatrician is notified. By law, CMV testing must be done before the child reaches 21 days of age.

Infants who test positive for congenital CMV are referred to the University of Utah, where medical providers educate the family about CMV, including possible sequelae, monitoring, and treatment options, as well as ways to prevent the spread of the infection.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Otology/Neurotology, Pediatric, Practice Focus, Special Reports Tagged With: hearing loss, pediatrics, screeningIssue: July 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • Do Antivirals Improve Hearing Outcomes in Neonates with Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection?
  • Early Cytomegalovirus Testing Can Detect Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Very Young Children
  • Should Infants Who Fail their Newborn Hearing Screen Undergo Cytomegalovirus Testing?
  • Diagnosis and Management of Congenital Hearing Loss

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939