ENTtoday
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

How Standard Is “Standard of Care”?

by Jane Jerrard • July 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Chicago— How much do your treatments and procedures vary from the established standard of care? Does it matter?

You Might Also Like

No related posts.

Explore This Issue
July 2006

The Triological Society panel on “The Elusive Standard of Care,” addressed these questions here at the 2006 Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings (COSM). The panel, moderated by Mark S. Persky, MD, Chair of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York City, provided an opportunity to review how four established otolaryngologists would approach the same patient.

No one on the panel uses facial nerve monitoring regularly during procedures, but the audience was in favor of it.

Panelists included Daniel Descher, MD, Director of the Norman Knight Hyperbaric Medicine Center at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary in Boston; Paul Donald, MD, Professor and Vice Chairman of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery and Director of the Center for Skull Base Surgery at the University of California-Davis; Gady Har-El, MD, Professor of Otolaryngology and Neurosurgery at State University of New York-Downstate in Brooklyn; and Richard Smith, MD, Associate Professor of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the Bronx, NY.

Dr. Persky began by providing a definition of standard of care, stating that it commonly accepted as “How similarly qualified practitioners manage a patient’s care under the same or similar circumstances.” However, he asked, “Could there be different standards of care?” Different physicians may be influenced by their personal experience or training, the medical community in which they practice, and the resources available to them.

Dr. Persky set out to vividly demonstrate possible differences in standards of care by asking the panel for their opinions on a specific case study. The case involved a 32-year-old woman with a two-year history of a slowly enlarging, two-centimeter, painless parotid mass. The woman’s cranial nerve (CN) VII was intact with no enlarged nodes.

Standards for Evaluation and Pre-Operative Tests

“How would you evaluate the patient?” Dr. Persky asked the panel. Dr. Donald spoke first, saying “I’d take her history and do a complete head and neck physical exam. Next, I’d ask for imaging. A CT scan or MRI is expensive, and they can add additional information—or not. Cytology is of some value, but it’s limited. I’d include cytology, and judge whether to do a CT scan on an individual case.”

Different physicians may be influenced by their personal experience or training, the medical community in which they practice, and the resources available to them.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Medical Education, Practice Management Tagged With: CT, guidelines, medical education, patient communication, policy, Quality, standards, surgery, testing, treatmentIssue: July 2006

You Might Also Like:

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Second Victims: The Effects of a Medical Error on Physicians Can Be Devastating
    • Advanced Degrees Can Help Otolaryngologists Better Understand the Business of Medicine
    • How to: A Dynamic Endonasal Columellar Strut Placement
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Qualitative Research Shows How Patients Feel About Quality-of-Life Issues
    • How to: A Dynamic Endonasal Columellar Strut Placement
    • Second Victims: The Effects of a Medical Error on Physicians Can Be Devastating
    • Advanced Degrees Can Help Otolaryngologists Better Understand the Business of Medicine
    • Laser Laryngeal Surgery Is Safe Under THRIVE

Polls

Have you ever been, or have you ever known someone who has been a second victim?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2023 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939