• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How Standard Is “Standard of Care”?

by Jane Jerrard • July 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Donald added that, “It all depends on how well the patient likes you and respects you. I underplay the malignancy part, and don’t talk about national statistics. I do tell them about scarring. They’re quite concerned about that.”

You Might Also Like

  • Proposed Vial Mixing Standard May Have Adverse Effects for Otolaryngologists
  • State-of-the-Art Techniques Are Tempting, but May Not Improve Care
  • Telehealth Care for HNC Cancer Survivors Compares Favorably to Standard Care in Certain Outcomes
  • Drop-In Clinics May Help with Patient Care-But Close Oversight is Necessary
Explore This Issue
July 2006

Standards for Surgery

Dr. Persky asked the panel to talk about their surgical practices on patients similar to the woman in his case study. Dr. Donald reported that he obtains frozen sections on all patients he operates on. “My colleagues do not do this,” he said. “We only have about two or three [technicians] we can really count on to diagnose the samples correctly.”

Dr. Persky asked the panel if they use facial nerve monitoring during procedures. No one on the panel uses it regularly, but the audience was in favor of it.

Continuing with his case study, Dr. Persky told the panel that when the patient was incised, the mass turned out to be low-grade carcinoma. “The facial nerve is involved intimately with the tumor,” he said. “What do you do?”

“I like to get a biopsy and have the diagnosis before sacrificing the nerve,” said Dr. Descher. Dr. Smith said he would “definitely do a frozen section before sacrificing it. I’ve had a couple that were not malignant. Unless it’s definitive, I would stop.”

Fine Needle Aspirations

Dr. Persky went on to lead the panel in a discussion of fine needle aspirations, asking them to review a different case study: A 52-year-old man presents with a six-month history of a slowly enlarging, painless right parotid mass. FNA shows lymphoid tissue. “Most of us would take out that mass anyway,” said Dr. Persky.

Regarding FNAs, he continued, the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) practice guidelines dictate that “If the parotid mass is mobile, discrete, and confined to the superficial lobe, no pre-operative FNA is necessary unless the patient’s medical condition is such that a general anesthetic would be very risky and a priority needs to be established.” This was obviously contrary to what the panel believed in as standard of care.

Furthermore, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery clinical indicators for parotidectomy call FNAs, ultrasounds, CT scans, and MRIs “optional tests.” Dr. Persky pointed out, however, that this “represents guidelines only, this does not represent standard of care.”

Facial Nerve Monitoring

The AHNS guidelines do not mention facial nerve monitoring, Dr. Persky pointed out. “The literature shows that there is no difference in postoperative CN VII integrity” with facial nerve monitoring,” he added.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Medical Education, Practice Management Tagged With: CT, guidelines, medical education, patient communication, policy, Quality, standards, surgery, testing, treatmentIssue: July 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Proposed Vial Mixing Standard May Have Adverse Effects for Otolaryngologists
  • State-of-the-Art Techniques Are Tempting, but May Not Improve Care
  • Telehealth Care for HNC Cancer Survivors Compares Favorably to Standard Care in Certain Outcomes
  • Drop-In Clinics May Help with Patient Care-But Close Oversight is Necessary

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you ever participated in a professional group's advocacy or Hill Day event?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Society Debuts TRIO Leadership Academy
    • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
    • How to Have Effective Presurgical Discussions
    • Advocacy: Finding Our Voice
    • A Royal Family Heritage: The Habsburg Jaw

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939