ICD-10 Implementation Delayed Indefinitely

You might also like:

• Lessons Learned: How to overcome the cultural barriers to EMR implementation
• Not So Fast: New quality provisions aren’t ready for implementation, medical groups say
• SM13: Early Diagnosis and Management of Delayed Speech
• Experts Push EHR Adoption: Expect to commit your time and finances, panelists say

Explore this issue:

March 2012

Tennant suggested providers work with their practice management system software vendors to put in writing what they will do when the code change approaches.

Otolaryngologists may be wondering for a bit longer what their next step should be now that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has announced in a Feb. 16 news release its intent to delay the October 2013 implementation of the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases coding system (ICD-10).

“The problem for everybody is that this message out of HHS was anything but definitive,” said Robert Tennant, a senior policy advisor with the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) in Washington, D.C. “It didn’t say we are definitively delaying 12 months, 18 months, 24 months. There are a number of options for the government here, and each one of them will have a different impact on an ENT practice.”

Tennant added the federal government could ultimately decide to delay for a short term, push implementation back several years or set up staggered effective dates for health care plans, clearinghouses, hospitals and private practices. MGMA is pushing for a delay until a pilot project on the use of the new code set can be completed and a cost-benefit analysis can be undertaken to show if the changeover would help practices.

Pages: 1 | 2 | Single Page