• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Otolaryngologists Apply Safety Strategies When Treating Threatening Patients

by Katie Robinson • April 8, 2026

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

When attempting to de-escalate tense situations, surgeons and other staff should maintain a calm tone and use respectful and clear language, while setting boundaries and avoiding power struggles.

You Might Also Like

  • Gun Violence as a Healthcare Issue: What Is the Responsibility of Otolaryngologists?
  • Safety Net: With violence on the rise, otolaryngologists implement prevention strategies
  • Why Abusive Incidents Against Physicians Are Rising and What Can Be Done about It
  • Unprofessional Physician Behavior Raises Discipline Dilemma, Patient Care Concerns
Explore This Issue
April 2026

Dr. Carter suggested telling the patient that you will not tolerate the behavior and may have to end the visit. “Involve office management and security early in an escalating interaction. Ask to take a break from the clinic visit so that they can calm themselves.”

Dr. Pandian, who highlighted the need for listening actively, offering validation without reinforcing harmful behavior, and offering choices when appropriate, suggested that it is important to recognize when de-escalation is no longer effective and to promptly shift to safety protocols.

A useful conceptual framework comes from Never Split the Difference, a book by Chris Voss, a former FBI hostage negotiator, Dr. Brenner said. “The book emphasizes tactical empathy, labeling emotions, and finding common ground to prevent escalation (https://www.blackswanltd.com/never-split-the-difference). That said, surgeons do not receive training in these areas, and the threshold for calling security is low. De-escalating potentially volatile situations should be done by professionals with these specialized skills.”

Duty and Ethics

Duty to treat exists within ethical and practical boundaries. “When personal or staff safety is threatened, the obligation shifts toward risk mitigation and alternative care arrangements,” Dr. Brenner explained. “This is not a failure of professionalism but an affirmation that safe systems are essential for ethical medical practice. Usually, the threat of violence can be defused and the duty to treat addressed under calmer and safer conditions.”

“Ethical guidance supports terminating a physician–patient relationship when behavior becomes threatening, if termination is conducted with appropriate notice, documentation, and assistance in identifying alternative care. Boundary setting is an expression of respect, not rejection, and helps ensure safety for everyone involved,” he added.

Physicians should never risk their own safety, but ethically, they should help the patient find another person to care for their condition. “However, this needs to be done in conjunction with law enforcement if physical violence has been threatened, because the next provider should not be placed at risk either,” Dr. Carter said, adding that involvement from patient advocacy may be necessary, as may referral for psychiatric care.

Dr. Wei noted that every hospital and their legal team has a policy that defines criteria to terminate a patient from the practice. “This is important to discuss and review; such decisions should not be made lightly, particularly when the patient is not at fault.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Filed Under: Cover Article, Features, Home Slider, Practice Management Tagged With: Safety Strategies, Threatening PatientsIssue: April 2026

You Might Also Like:

  • Gun Violence as a Healthcare Issue: What Is the Responsibility of Otolaryngologists?
  • Safety Net: With violence on the rise, otolaryngologists implement prevention strategies
  • Why Abusive Incidents Against Physicians Are Rising and What Can Be Done about It
  • Unprofessional Physician Behavior Raises Discipline Dilemma, Patient Care Concerns

Comments

  1. David David says

    April 17, 2026 at 7:56 pm

    A marvelous review with excellent suggestions.

    To relate a brief episode: I was the only ENT in my county. We were 150 Miles N of Portland Maine with no oral surgeons (although I had been doing all the fractured jaws for years). We had a patient on whom I was very familiar, having done a mastoidectomy on him several years previously. He was in the ER having suffered a (well deserved) fractured jaw. He was yelling at the nurses and grossly threatening. I stepped in and having reviewed his Xrays demonstrating a simple jaw fracture. I met with him, rubbing my jaw and explaining that his fracsture was QUITE SEVERE and WAY BEYOND MY EXPERTISE!! (which it was not). So instead of referring him to the oral surgeons 45 miles South, there was no way that I would send him to some of my friends, So I sent him the the EXPERTS in PORTLAND, MAINE 120 miles south. So thus he could have all the expertiese of the residents on call.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you ever participated in a professional group's advocacy or Hill Day event?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Royal Family Heritage: The Habsburg Jaw
    • What Does The Pitt Have Against Otolaryngologists?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Society Debuts TRIO Leadership Academy
    • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
    • How to Have Effective Presurgical Discussions
    • Advocacy: Finding Our Voice
    • A Royal Family Heritage: The Habsburg Jaw

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939