• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Point-of-Care CT Scanning in Otolaryngology: Boon for Patients and Physicians: Part 1 of 2

by Gretchen Henkel • January 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Interpretation of the scans can be accomplished using built-in teleradiology features, which offer real-time reads of the scans. Dr. Hopp-who is also President of InHouse Radiology Medical Group, a start-up company that provides teleradiology services to physicians with imaging devices in their offices-uses this feature with his in-office CT scanner to sign off on scans. Dr. Sillers reads his own scans, a practice he has carried out for 14 years. In Alabama, he is not reimbursed for reading his own scans (a radiologist doing the read could bill for this function, however). Thus, there is no financial incentive for him to read the scans. Sometimes, he said, people may incorrectly assume that otolaryngologists read their own scans simply to capture all the income streams from in-office CT scanning.

You Might Also Like

  • To Accredit or Not to Accredit?: Accreditation Soon May Be Required for In-Office CT Scanners: Part 2 of 3
  • CT Scanning of the Paranasal Sinuses: Indications, Utilization, and Radiation Risks
  • Physician Assistants in Otolaryngology Can Be a Boon to Otolaryngology Practices With the Substantial Training They Receive
  • Otolaryngology Training Short on End-of-Life Care Advice
Explore This Issue
January 2008

Costs and Gains

Otolaryngologists interviewed by ENT Today cited patient convenience and satisfaction as the major benefits of acquiring point-of-service CT. Point-of-service CT scans minimize the interruption in patients’ lives, noted Jacquie Lipton, Marketing Manager for GE Healthcare. They don’t need to leave work twice or schedule someone to take them for a scan. Others have validated an increase in practice revenue.

Ms. Vestevich of Xoran commented that payback can vary from four to 30 months, with the typical time frame being about a year. Otolaryngologists have reported a 300% return on investment, she said. Many GE customers, said Sofiane Laoussadi, Commercial Leader for GE Healthcare Financial Services, opt for a fair market value lease, which enables the physician to upgrade to a newer generation product at the end of the lease term-a plus in this era of fast-evolving technology.

Installation does not usually require reinforcement of floors, or installation of cooling systems or additional power supply (as are required for installation of full-body CT machines). Other attendant costs can include time and money to obtain credentialing as a diagnostic laboratory, and ongoing training and safety certification. (The latter two issues will be addressed in Part 2 of this article.) Obtaining precertification with payers for CT scans, observed our sources, may require some adjustments (such as establishing online or phone approvals) to retain the convenience factor for patients of same-day office visits and scans (see sidebar).

Although it took about 18 months for Dr. Sillers to realize a return on his investment for the in-office CT scanner, increased revenue was not the primary factor in his decision to buy the machine. It’s a tool that’s quite helpful in caring for my patients, particularly those with complicated rhinologic disease, he said. I look upon it as a piece of equipment that I need to practice my trade.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Medical Education, Tech Talk Tagged With: certification, costs, CT, patient satisfaction, pediatrics, Quality, radiation, reimbursement, technologyIssue: January 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • To Accredit or Not to Accredit?: Accreditation Soon May Be Required for In-Office CT Scanners: Part 2 of 3
  • CT Scanning of the Paranasal Sinuses: Indications, Utilization, and Radiation Risks
  • Physician Assistants in Otolaryngology Can Be a Boon to Otolaryngology Practices With the Substantial Training They Receive
  • Otolaryngology Training Short on End-of-Life Care Advice

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939