• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Rooting Out CRS Causes Is Cause for Debate

by Thomas R. Collins • June 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Kern said that because 78% of the patients in that study also had asthma, there are questions about fungi’s precise role. At heart, that is the single most important piece of evidence in support of the fungal hypothesis, he said. But if you remember, the vast majority of those patients also had asthma. So you’re taking blood from a patient with asthma-how do you know which is causing the response, asthma or polypoid sinusitis?

You Might Also Like

  • The Etiology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Remains Unclear
  • Saline Irrigation Effective in Treating CRS
  • SEMA4D Exacerbates Eosinophilic CRS in Humans, Mice
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis, CRS Show Associations as Comorbid Conditions
Explore This Issue
June 2009

Dr. Kern also said that Dr. Ponikau’s studies involved massive amounts of antigens, far more than would ever be experienced at the epithelial surface.

So it’s difficult to say that they are specific responses in the sense of relevance to the clinical state, he said.

Dr. Ponikau said later that his lab tested many different concentrations of fungal antigens before carrying out the study; they found that 50 mcg/mL was optimal, and that using a lesser or greater concentration didn’t work as well. He added that nobody knows the actual concentration of the antigen on the T-cells in vivo in CRS patients.

The debate is likely to continue.

In the end, Dr. Kern said, It comes down, I guess, to being a believer or not.

©2009 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Rhinology Tagged With: chronic rhinosinusitis, diagnosis, fungus, microbe, treatmentIssue: June 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • The Etiology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Remains Unclear
  • Saline Irrigation Effective in Treating CRS
  • SEMA4D Exacerbates Eosinophilic CRS in Humans, Mice
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis, CRS Show Associations as Comorbid Conditions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939