• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

In-Office Conscious Sedation Is Safe When Used Properly

by Paula Moyer • December 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In addition to monitoring equipment and reversing medication, the facility needs to have the equipment necessary to intubate, should the occasion arise, including a laryngoscope. The cart needs to be checked on a regular basis, and the staff needs to be trained in conscious sedation, Dr. Carruthers added. Ideally an anesthesiologist should be present. It’s an excellent technique, but it’s one level short of general anesthesia and you need to manage it properly, and the facilities should be accredited by a proper accrediting agency.

You Might Also Like

  • Office-Based FNA Thyroid Nodule Biopsies a Viable Option
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Percutaneous Dilation Tracheotomy Can Be a Safe, Effective Nonsurgical Option
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology
Explore This Issue
December 2006

Although the thought of yet another accreditation process may be daunting, it should be a collaborative experience between the facility and the accreditation agency, he said. I find the accreditation process nothing but helpful, Dr. Carruthers said, adding that if the facility’s effort to strive for excellence is obvious, the accreditation staff will become more relaxed over time.

He agreed with Dr. Papel that patients should be advised not only not to drive, but to bring a driver rather than relying on a cab, and to delay important decisions for 48 hours after having been sedated.

Although his preference is for an anesthesiologist to monitor the conscious sedation, he added that there is a role for surgeons to administer it under certain circumstances. I think a physician licensed to practice should be able to do what he or she is trained to do, he said. If an individual goes through a prescribed course of training to safely administer and supervise conscious, that’s fine.

However, he stressed that the key is safety. The person administering the sedation-an anesthesiologist, surgeon, or nurse anesthetist-needs to be able to concentrate on an individual if things go wrong, he said.

©2006 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Medical Education, Practice Management Tagged With: guidelines, in-office, outcomes, patient safety, practice management, research, sedation, surgery, trainingIssue: December 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Office-Based FNA Thyroid Nodule Biopsies a Viable Option
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Percutaneous Dilation Tracheotomy Can Be a Safe, Effective Nonsurgical Option
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you successfully navigated a mid-career change?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • Physician, Know Thyself! Tips for Navigating Mid-Career Transitions in Otolaryngology

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
    • Journal Publishing Format Suggestion: A Greener Future for Medical Journals
    • Physician, Know Thyself! Tips for Navigating Mid-Career Transitions in Otolaryngology
    • PA Reform: Is the Administrative War of Attrition Ending?
    • How To: Anatomic-Based Technique for Sensing Lead Placement in Hypoglossal Stimulator Implantation

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939